Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29378697›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

Alternatives to the face-to-face consultation in general practice: focused ethnographic case study.

Helen Atherton, Heather Brant, Sue Ziebland, Annemieke Bikker, John Campbell, Andy Gibson, Brian McKinstry, Tania Porqueddu, Chris Salisbury

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. What patients want from access to UK general practice: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Access to general practice appointments and sustainable change: a focused ethnographic case study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evolution of the general practice receptionist role and online services: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The obscured face in video consultations. A Levinasian analysis.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Helen AthertonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry.
Heather BrantCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Sue ZieblandNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Annemieke BikkerUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
John CampbellUniversity of Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), University of Exeter, Exeter.
Andy GibsonHealth and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol.
Brian McKinstryUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Tania PorquedduNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Chris SalisburyCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/13/59/08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNHS policy encourages general practices to introduce alternatives to the face-to-face consultation, such as telephone, email, e-consultation systems, or internet video. Most have been slow to adopt these, citing concerns about workload. This project builds on previous research by focusing on the experiences of patients and practitioners who have used one or more of these alternatives.

aimTo understand how, under what conditions, for which patients, and in what ways, alternatives to face-to-face consultations present benefits and challenges to patients and practitioners in general practice. DESIGN AND

settingFocused ethnographic case studies took place in eight UK general practices between June 2015 and March 2016.

methodNon-participant observation, informal conversations with staff, and semi-structured interviews with staff and patients were conducted. Practice documents and protocols were reviewed. Data were analysed through charting and the 'one sheet of paper' mind-map method to identify the line of argument in each thematic report.

resultsCase study practices had different rationales for offering alternatives to the face-to-face consultation. Beliefs varied about which patients and health issues were suitable. Co-workers were often unaware of each other's practice; for example, practice policies for use of e-consultations systems with patients were not known about or followed. Patients reported benefits including convenience and access. Staff and some patients regarded the face-to-face consultation as the ideal.

conclusionExperience of implementing alternatives to the face-to-face consultation suggests that changes in patient access and staff workload may be both modest and gradual. Practices planning to implement them should consider carefully their reasons for doing so and involve the whole practice team.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalGeneral PracticeRemote ConsultationAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMalePatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice ManagementUnited KingdomWorkloadcommunicationelectronic mailethnographygeneral practicequalitative researchremote consultationworkload

Identifiers

PMID29378697
PMCPMC5863684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.