Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29378561›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2018

Primary palliative Care in General Practice - study protocol of a three-stage mixed-methods organizational health services research study.

Helen Ewertowski, Fabian Tetzlaff, Stephanie Stiel, Nils Schneider, Saskia Jünger

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrating palliative care into primary healthcare systems: Advocacy efforts, milestones and challenges in Asia.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Helen EwertowskiInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany. Ewertowski.Helen@MH-Hannover.de.
Fabian TetzlaffInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
Stephanie StielInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
Nils SchneiderInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
Saskia JüngerInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung BMBF-FK 01 GY 1610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe focus of this project is on improving the provision of primary palliative care (PC) by general practitioners (GPs). While approximately 10-15% of the incurable, seriously ill or dying people will be in need of specialist PC, the vast majority can be adequately treated within generalist care. The strengthening of the GP's role in PC, as well as ensuring close collaboration between specialist PC services and GPs have been identified as top priorities for the improvement of PC in Germany. Despite healthcare policy actions, diverse obstacles still exist to successful implementation of primary PC on a structural, process, and economic level. Therefore, this project aims at addressing barriers and facilitators to primary PC delivery in general practice in Germany.

methodsThe study follows a three-step approach; first, it aims at systematically analyzing barriers and facilitators to primary PC provision by GPs. Second, based on these outcomes, a tailored intervention package will be developed to enhance the provision of primary PC by GPs. Third, the intervention package will be implemented and evaluated in practice. The expected outcome will be an evidence-based model for successful implementation of primary PC delivery tailored to the German healthcare system, followed by a strategic action plan on how to improve current practice both on a local level and nationally. DISCUSSION: The first step of the project has been partly completed at the time of writing. The chosen methodologies of four sub-projects within this first step have opened up different advantages and disadvantages for the data collection. In sum of all sub-projects, the different methodologies and target groups contributed valuable information to the systematic analysis of barriers and facilitators to primary PC provision by GPs.

trial registrationThe study (BMBF-FK 01 GY 1610) was retrospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien) (Registration N° DRKS00011821 ; date of registration: December 04th 2017) and at the German Register of health care research (Versorgungsforschung Deutschland - Datenbank) (Registration N° VfD_ALLPRAX_16_003817 ; date of registration: March 30th 2017).

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareGeneral PractitionersGermanyHealth PolicyHumansModels, OrganizationalPalliative CarePrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchResearch DesignWorkforceComplex interventionGeneral practiceOrganizational health services researchPrimary palliative care

Identifiers

PMID29378561
PMCPMC5789650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.