Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29378545›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2018

Under-vaccinated groups in Europe and their beliefs, attitudes and reasons for non-vaccination; two systematic reviews.

N Fournet, L Mollema, W L Ruijs, I A Harmsen, F Keck, J Y Durand, M P Cunha, M Wamsiedel, R Reis, J French and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

N FournetCentre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
L MollemaCentre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Liesbeth.Mollema@rivm.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2868-0821
W L RuijsCentre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
I A HarmsenMunicipal Health Service (GGD) Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
F KeckLaboratoire d'anthropologie sociale - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France.
J Y DurandCentre for Research in Anthropology, Universidade do Minho (CRIA - UMinho), Braga, Portugal.
M P CunhaCentre for Research in Anthropology, Universidade do Minho (CRIA - UMinho), Braga, Portugal.
M WamsiedelDepartment of Public Health at Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China.
R ReisLeiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J FrenchStrategic Social Marketing, Liphook, UK.
E G SmitAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A KitchingDepartment of Public Health, Health Service Executive, St Finbarr's Hospital, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
J E van SteenbergenCentre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLCentre for Research in Anthropology · PTGGD Amsterdam · NLHealth Service Executive · IELaboratoire d'Anthropologie Sociale · FRLeiden University · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Brighton · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZAXi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University · CN

Funding

This research was funded by the EU FP7-Health-2011 Work Programme as part of work package six of the E-com@eu Consortium Effective Communication in Outbreak Management: International vaccine-resistant group analysis 278763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite effective national immunisation programmes in Europe, some groups remain incompletely or un-vaccinated ('under-vaccinated'), with underserved minorities and certain religious/ideological groups repeatedly being involved in outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases (VPD). Gaining insight into factors regarding acceptance of vaccination of 'under-vaccinated groups' (UVGs) might give opportunities to communicate with them in a trusty and reliable manner that respects their belief system and that, maybe, increase vaccination uptake. We aimed to identify and describe UVGs in Europe and to describe beliefs, attitudes and reasons for non-vaccination in the identified UVGs.

methodsWe defined a UVG as a group of persons who share the same beliefs and/or live in socially close-knit communities in Europe and who have/had historically low vaccination coverage and/or experienced outbreaks of VPDs since 1950. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases using specific search term combinations. For the first systematic review, studies that described a group in Europe with an outbreak or low vaccination coverage for a VPD were selected and for the second systematic review, studies that described possible factors that are associated with non-vaccination in these groups were selected.

resultsWe selected 48 articles out of 606 and 13 articles out of 406 from the first and second search, respectively. Five UVGs were identified in the literature: Orthodox Protestant communities, Anthroposophists, Roma, Irish Travellers, and Orthodox Jewish communities. The main reported factors regarding vaccination were perceived non-severity of traditional "childhood" diseases, fear of vaccine side-effects, and need for more information about for example risk of vaccination.

conclusionsWithin each UVG identified, there are a variety of health beliefs and objections to vaccination. In addition, similar factors are shared by several of these groups. Communication strategies regarding these similar factors such as educating people about the risks associated with being vaccinated versus not being vaccinated, addressing their concerns, and countering vaccination myths present among members of a specific UVG through a trusted source, can establish a reliable relationship with these groups and increase their vaccination uptake. Furthermore, other interventions such as improving access to health care could certainly increase vaccination uptake in Roma and Irish travellers.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeEuropeHumansTreatment RefusalVaccinationAnthroposophicAttitude regarding vaccinationBeliefs vaccineEuropeIrish TravellersLow vaccination coverageReligionRomaUnder-vaccinated groupsVaccine preventable diseases

Identifiers

PMID29378545
PMCPMC5789742
OpenAlexW2787628222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.