ArticleBMC public health2018
Cigarette smoking and smoking-attributable diseases among Estonian physicians: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tobacco use and readiness to treat tobacco users among primary healthcare professionals in Soweto.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024Article
- Nicotine Dependence and Factors Related to Smoking Cessation among Physicians in Estonia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Cigarette and E-Cigarette Use and Smoking Cessation Practices among Physicians in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSmoking is a risk factor for several diseases. Physicians are role models for their patients. Physicians who smoke underestimate the health risks of smoking and may be less likely to offer advice to help their patients to quit. The aim of this study was to: provide an overview of smoking behaviour among Estonian physicians; assess the relationship between smoking and ischaemic heart disease (IHD), chronic bronchitis (CB), and lung emphysema (LE); and estimate fractions of prevalences of the three diseases attributable to smoking.
methodsSelf-administered questionnaires were sent to practising physicians (n = 5666) in Estonia in 2014. Prevalence of smoking and relative risks for IHD, CB and LE as well as the risks of IHD, CB and LE attributable to smoking were calculated by age and sex. Post-stratification was used to compensate non-response.
resultsThere were 535 male and 2404 female physicians participating. The prevalence of daily smoking was 12.4% (95% CI 10.4-14.4%) among men and 5.0% (95% CI 4.4-5.6%) among women. Mean duration of smoking among male and female daily smokers was 28.6 (95% CI 26.1-31.1) and 28.6 (95% CI 27.1-30.2) years. Compared to lifelong non-smokers, the age-adjusted risk for IHD was 1.29 times (95% CI 0.88-1.89) higher for men, but 1.69 times (95% CI 1.17-2.40) lower for all women who have ever smoked. The risk for CB was 2.29 (95% CI 1.30-4.03) times higher for smokers among men and, 1.32 (95% CI 0.95-1.82) among women; the risk ratio for LE was 4.92 (95% CI 1.14-21.1) among men and 2.45 (95% CI 0.63-9.52) among women. The smoking-attributable risk for IHD was 3.2% (95% CI 2.3-4.1%) among men and - 0.1% (95% CI -0.7-0.4%) among women; for CB 6.9% (95% CI 6.0-7.8%) and 4.2% (95% CI 3.5-4.8%); and for LE 18.8% (95% CI 17.0-22.5%) and 22.6% (95% CI 18.5-26.9%), respectively.
conclusionPrevalence of daily smoking was relatively low among Estonian physicians (and twice lower among female physicians). The risk attributable to smoking was higher for LE and CB than for IHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.