Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29378510›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Transcriptomic profiling of Burkholderia phymatum STM815, Cupriavidus taiwanensis LMG19424 and Rhizobium mesoamericanum STM3625 in response to Mimosa pudica root exudates illuminates the molecular basis of their nodulation competitiveness and symbiotic evolutionary history.

Agnieszka Klonowska, Rémy Melkonian, Lucie Miché, Pierre Tisseyre, Lionel Moulin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A rhamnose-rich O-antigen ofJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. 3 Biotech · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Differential Expression ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Agnieszka KlonowskaIRD, Cirad, University of Montpellier, IPME, Montpellier, France.
Rémy MelkonianIRD, UMR LSTM, Campus de Baillarguet, Montpellier, France.
Lucie MichéIRD, UMR LSTM, Campus de Baillarguet, Montpellier, France.
Pierre TisseyreIRD, UMR LSTM, Campus de Baillarguet, Montpellier, France.
Lionel MoulinIRD, Cirad, University of Montpellier, IPME, Montpellier, France. lionel.moulin@ird.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9068-6912
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRLaboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-09-JCJC-0046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRhizobial symbionts belong to the classes Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria (called "alpha" and "beta"-rhizobia). Most knowledge on the genetic basis of symbiosis is based on model strains belonging to alpha-rhizobia. Mimosa pudica is a legume that offers an excellent opportunity to study the adaptation toward symbiotic nitrogen fixation in beta-rhizobia compared to alpha-rhizobia. In a previous study (Melkonian et al., Environ Microbiol 16:2099-111, 2014) we described the symbiotic competitiveness of M. pudica symbionts belonging to Burkholderia, Cupriavidus and Rhizobium species.

resultsIn this article we present a comparative analysis of the transcriptomes (by RNAseq) of B. phymatum STM815 (BP), C. taiwanensis LMG19424 (CT) and R. mesoamericanum STM3625 (RM) in conditions mimicking the early steps of symbiosis (i.e. perception of root exudates). BP exhibited the strongest transcriptome shift both quantitatively and qualitatively, which mirrors its high competitiveness in the early steps of symbiosis and its ancient evolutionary history as a symbiont, while CT had a minimal response which correlates with its status as a younger symbiont (probably via acquisition of symbiotic genes from a Burkholderia ancestor) and RM had a typical response of Alphaproteobacterial rhizospheric bacteria. Interestingly, the upregulation of nodulation genes was the only common response among the three strains; the exception was an up-regulated gene encoding a putative fatty acid hydroxylase, which appears to be a novel symbiotic gene specific to Mimosa symbionts.

conclusionThe transcriptional response to root exudates was correlated to each strain nodulation competitiveness, with Burkholderia phymatum appearing as the best specialised symbiont of Mimosa pudica.

Indexed as

BurkholderiaCupriavidusGene Expression ProfilingGenome, BacterialMicrobial InteractionsMimosaPlant Root NodulationPlant RootsRhizobiumSymbiosisAlpha-rhizobiaBeta-rhizobiaRNA-seqSymbiosisTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID29378510
PMCPMC5789663
OpenAlexW2794854067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.