ArticleBMC genomics2018
Quantitative or qualitative transcriptional diagnostic signatures? A case study for colorectal cancer.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the influence of pre-analytical variables on gene expression measurements and relative expression orderings in cancer research.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Less is more: relative rank is more informative than absolute abundance for compositional NGS data.Briefings in functional genomics · 2025Review
- Individualized diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: A rank-based qualitative T cell-related signature.PloS one · 2025Article
- Qualitative Transcriptional Signature for Predicting the Pathological Response of Colorectal Cancer to FOLFIRI Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Individualized detection of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion status in prostate cancer: a rank-based qualitative transcriptome signature.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Systematic exploration of the underlying mechanism of gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Molecular oncology · 2022Article
- Hierarchical identification of a transcriptional panel for the histological diagnosis of lung neuroendocrine tumors.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- lncRNA pair as candidate diagnostic signature for colorectal cancer based on the within-sample relative expression levels.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The prognostic and clinical significance of IFI44L aberrant downregulation in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Discovering a qualitative transcriptional signature of homologous recombination defectiveness for prostate cancer.iScience · 2021Article
- Emergence of Cardiac Glycosides as Potential Drugs: Current and Future Scope for Cancer Therapeutics.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Identification of the origin of brain metastases based on the relative methylation orderings of CpG sites.Epigenetics · 2021Article
- Stratification of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma to facilitate drug repositioning.iScience · 2021Article
- A qualitative transcriptional signature for determining the grade of colorectal adenocarcinoma.Cancer gene therapy · 2020Article
- Article
- A Qualitative Transcriptional Signature for the Risk Assessment of Precancerous Colorectal Lesions.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Qualitative transcriptional signature for predicting pathological response of colorectal cancer to FOLFOX therapy.Cancer science · 2020Article
- A Qualitative Transcriptional Signature for Predicting Extreme Resistance of ER-Negative Breast Cancer to Paclitaxel, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
- Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Machine Learning Method.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- The Effects of Age, Cigarette Smoking, Sex, and Race on the Qualitative Characteristics of Lung Transcriptome.BioMed research international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDue to experimental batch effects, the application of a quantitative transcriptional signature for disease diagnoses commonly requires inter-sample data normalization, which would be hardly applicable under common clinical settings. Many cancers might have qualitative differences with the non-cancer states in the gene expression pattern. Therefore, it is reasonable to explore the power of qualitative diagnostic signatures which are robust against experimental batch effects and other random factors.
resultsFirstly, using data of technical replicate samples from the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project, we demonstrated that the low-throughput PCR-based technologies also exist large measurement variations for gene expression even when the samples were measured in the same test site. Then, we demonstrated the critical limitation of low stability for classifiers based on quantitative transcriptional signatures in applications to individual samples through a case study using a support vector machine and a naïve Bayesian classifier to discriminate colorectal cancer tissues from normal tissues. To address this problem, we identified a signature consisting of three gene pairs for discriminating colorectal cancer tissues from non-cancer (normal and inflammatory bowel disease) tissues based on within-sample relative expression orderings (REOs) of these gene pairs. The signature was well verified using 22 independent datasets measured by different microarray and RNA_seq platforms, obviating the need of inter-sample data normalization.
conclusionsSubtle quantitative information of gene expression measurements tends to be unstable under current technical conditions, which will introduce uncertainty to clinical applications of the quantitative transcriptional diagnostic signatures. For diagnosis of disease states with qualitative transcriptional characteristics, the qualitative REO-based signatures could be robustly applied to individual samples measured by different platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.