Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29378040›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2018

Postprandial Metabolism and Appetite Do Not Differ between Lean Adults that Eat Breakfast or Morning Fast for 6 Weeks.

Enhad A Chowdhury, Judith D Richardson, Kostas Tsintzas, Dylan Thompson, James A Betts

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Circadian clock and temporal meal pattern.Medical review (2021) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Nutrient timing and metabolic regulation.The Journal of physiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Enhad A ChowdhuryDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Judith D RichardsonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Kostas TsintzasSchool of Life Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Dylan ThompsonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
James A BettsDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H008322/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It remains unknown whether sustained daily feeding-fasting patterns modify the acute response to specific feedings on a given day. Objective: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to establish if daily breakfast consumption or fasting until noon modifies the acute metabolic and appetitive responses to a fixed breakfast and ad libitum lunch. Methods: With the use of a parallel group design, we randomly assigned 31 healthy, lean men and women (22-56 y) to 6 wk of either consuming ≥700 kcal of self-selected items before 1100 or fasting (0 kcal) until 1200 daily. Following 48 h of diet and physical activity standardization, we examined metabolic and appetite responses to a standardized breakfast and ad libitum lunch before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using 3- and 2-way ANCOVA. Results: Systemic concentrations of energy balance regulatory hormones total and acylated ghrelin, leptin, and peptide tyrosine-tyrosine) responded similarly to breakfast and lunch before and after 6 wk of either morning fasting or regular breakfast, with the exception of a tendency for increased glucagon-like peptide-1 concentrations from baseline to follow-up in the Breakfast Group compared with a decrease over that period in the Fasting Group [P = 0.06, partial eta squared value (ƞ2) = 0.16]. Subjective appetite sensations also did not differ over the course of the day, and ad libitum energy intake at lunch was not systematically affected by either intervention, decreasing by 27 kcal (95% CI: -203, 149 kcal) with fasting and by 77 kcal (95% CI: -210, 56 kcal) with breakfast. Similarly, glycemic, insulinemic, lipemic, and thermogenic responses to breakfast and lunch were very stable at baseline and follow-up and, thus, did not differ between treatment groups. Conclusions: Our results indicate that a sustained period of either extended morning fasting or eating a daily breakfast has minimal effect upon acute metabolic and appetite responses in lean adults. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.org as ISRCTN31521726.

Indexed as

AppetiteBreakfastMetabolismPostprandial PeriodAdultBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexCross-Over StudiesDipeptidesEnergy MetabolismExerciseFastingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGhrelinGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Blood GlucoseDipeptidesGhrelinGlucagon-Like Peptide 1InsulinLeptintyrosyltyrosineappetite hormonesbreakfast skippingenergy intakeinsulin sensitivitysecond-meal effect

Identifiers

PMID29378040
PMCPMC5972605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.