ArticlePLoS genetics2018
Identifying and exploiting trait-relevant tissues with multiple functional annotations in genome-wide association studies.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Review of Statistical Methods for Identifying Trait-Relevant Tissues and Cell Types.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Pooled it
- High false sign rates in transcriptome-wide association studies.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Identifying independent causal cell types for human diseases and risk variants.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Conditional transcriptome-wide association study for fine-mapping candidate causal genes.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- Novel insight into the etiology of ischemic stroke gained by integrative multiome-wide association study.Human molecular genetics · 2024Article
- Novel insight into the etiology of ischemic stroke gained by integrative transcriptome-wide association study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Dissecting Complex Traits Using Omics Data: A Review on the Linear Mixed Models and Their Application in GWAS.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A robust two-sample transcriptome-wide Mendelian randomization method integrating GWAS with multi-tissue eQTL summary statistics.Genetic epidemiology · 2021Article
- New novel non-MHC genes were identified for cervical cancer with an integrative analysis approach of transcriptome-wide association study.Journal of Cancer · 2021Article
- Pinpointing miRNA and genes enrichment over trait-relevant tissue network in Genome-Wide Association Studies.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- Incorporating multiple sets of eQTL weights into gene-by-environment interaction analysis identifies novel susceptibility loci for pancreatic cancer.Genetic epidemiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Dynamic incorporation of multiple in silico functional annotations empowers rare variant association analysis of large whole-genome sequencing studies at scale.Nature genetics · 2020Article
- Epigenomics and genotype-phenotype association analyses reveal conserved genetic architecture of complex traits in cattle and human.BMC biology · 2020Article
- Genetic Architecture of Gene Expression in European and African Americans: An eQTL Mapping Study in GENOA.American journal of human genetics · 2020Article
- Leveraging gene co-expression patterns to infer trait-relevant tissues in genome-wide association studies.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Multiple-Tissue Integrative Transcriptome-Wide Association Studies Discovered New Genes Associated With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Statistical methods for SNP heritability estimation and partition: A review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- The Evolving Field of Genetic Epidemiology: From Familial Aggregation to Genomic Sequencing.American journal of epidemiology · 2019Review
- DESE: estimating driver tissues by selective expression of genes associated with complex diseases or traits.Genome biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified many disease associated loci, the majority of which have unknown biological functions. Understanding the mechanism underlying trait associations requires identifying trait-relevant tissues and investigating associations in a trait-specific fashion. Here, we extend the widely used linear mixed model to incorporate multiple SNP functional annotations from omics studies with GWAS summary statistics to facilitate the identification of trait-relevant tissues, with which to further construct powerful association tests. Specifically, we rely on a generalized estimating equation based algorithm for parameter inference, a mixture modeling framework for trait-tissue relevance classification, and a weighted sequence kernel association test constructed based on the identified trait-relevant tissues for powerful association analysis. We refer to our analytic procedure as the Scalable Multiple Annotation integration for trait-Relevant Tissue identification and usage (SMART). With extensive simulations, we show how our method can make use of multiple complementary annotations to improve the accuracy for identifying trait-relevant tissues. In addition, our procedure allows us to make use of the inferred trait-relevant tissues, for the first time, to construct more powerful SNP set tests. We apply our method for an in-depth analysis of 43 traits from 28 GWASs using tissue-specific annotations in 105 tissues derived from ENCODE and Roadmap. Our results reveal new trait-tissue relevance, pinpoint important annotations that are informative of trait-tissue relationship, and illustrate how we can use the inferred trait-relevant tissues to construct more powerful association tests in the Wellcome trust case control consortium study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.