Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29377871›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the colon and rectum2018

Symptom Severity and Quality of Life Among Long-term Colorectal Cancer Survivors Compared With Matched Control Subjects: A Population-Based Study.

Tae L Hart, Susan T Charles, Mekhala Gunaratne, Nancy N Baxter, Michelle Cotterchio, Zane Cohen, Steven Gallinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Health-related quality of life and lifestyle in long-term survivors of colorectal cancer and a matched non-cancer reference group.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, and mortality among colorectal patients: 5-year follow-up.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Survivorship Guidance for Patients with Colorectal Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tae L Hart
Susan T CharlesDepartment of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California.
Mekhala GunaratneDepartment of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nancy N BaxterDepartment of Surgery and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle CotterchioPrevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zane CohenSinai Health System, Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Steven GallingerHepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgical Oncology Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Toronto Metropolitan University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CACancer Care Ontario · CASinai Health System · CAUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

ONTARIO REGISTRY FOR STUDIES OF FAMILIAL COLON CANCERU01CA074783 · NCI · CANCER CARE ONTARIO · PI GALLINGER, STEVEN · 1997 to 2008
$12.5M
Colon Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA167551 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAILE, ROBERT WILLIAM, JENKINS, MARK A · 2013 to 2017
$11.3M
The Colon Cancer Family Registry: OntarioU24CA074783 · NCI · CANCER CARE ONTARIO · PI GALLINGER, STEVEN · 2008 to 2011
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA074783NCI NIH HHS U24 CA074783NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA167551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData are lacking regarding physical functioning, psychological well-being, and quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors >10 years postdiagnosis.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine self-reported physical functioning, quality of life, and psychological well-being in long-term colorectal cancer survivors compared with age- and sex-matched unaffected control subjects.

designParticipants completed a cross-sectional survey. SETTINGS: The colorectal cancer survivors and unaffected control subjects were recruited from the Ontario Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry. PATIENTS: A population-based sample of colorectal cancer survivors (N = 296) and their age- and sex-matched unaffected control subjects (N = 255) were included. Survivors were, on average, 15 years postdiagnosis.

main outcome measuresQuality of life was measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scale, bowel dysfunction with the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center scale, urinary dysfunction with the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, fatigue with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale, and depression with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale.

resultsIn linear mixed-model analyses adjusting for income, education, race, and comorbid medical conditions, survivors reported good emotional, functional, physical, and overall quality of life, comparable to control subjects. Fatigue and urinary functioning did not differ significantly between survivors and control subjects. Survivors reported significantly higher social quality of life and lower depression compared with unaffected control subjects. The only area where survivors reported significantly worse deficits was in bowel dysfunction, but the magnitude of differences was relatively small. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is limited by moderately low participation rates. Findings are likely biased toward healthy participants. No baseline assessment was available to examine change in outcomes over time.

conclusionsLong-term colorectal cancer survivors appear to have comparable quality of life and, in some areas, better well-being than their unaffected peers. Bowel dysfunction may continue to be an ongoing issue even 15 years after colorectal cancer diagnosis. Overall quality of life can be expected to be good in this group of older survivors. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A476.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCanadaCancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRegistriesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID29377871
PMCPMC5805591
OpenAlexW2790002389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.