Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29377785›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2018

Communicating with Daughters About Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: Individual, Family, and Provider Influences on Women's Knowledge of Cancer Risk.

Lucy A Peipins, Juan L Rodriguez, Nikki A Hawkins, Ashwini Soman, Mary C White, M Elizabeth Hodgson, Lisa A DeRoo, Dale P Sandler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Understanding Medical Mistrust in Black Women at Risk of BRCA 1/2 Mutations.Journal of health disparities research and practice · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucy A Peipins1 Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
Juan L Rodriguez1 Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
Nikki A Hawkins2 National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Disease Promotion, Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
Ashwini Soman3 Northrop Grumman Corporation , Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia .
Mary C White1 Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
M Elizabeth Hodgson4 Social and Scientific Systems, Inc. , Durham, North Carolina.
Lisa A DeRoo5 Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway .
Dale P Sandler6 Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: The Sister StudyZ01ES044005 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 1999 to 2008
$1.3M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIEHS NIH HHS Z01 ES044005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen facing complex and uncertain situations such as cancer in their families may seek information from a variety of sources to gain knowledge about cancer risk and reduce uncertainty. We describe and assess the relative importance of information sources about familial breast cancer at the individual, family, and healthcare provider levels influencing women's reporting they had enough information to speak with daughters about breast cancer. This outcome we refer to as being informed about breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsSister Study participants, a cohort of women with a family history of breast cancer, were surveyed on family cancer history, family communication, social support, and interactions with healthcare providers (n = 11,766). Adjusted percentages and 95% confidence intervals for being informed about breast cancer versus not being informed were computed for individual-, family-, and provider-level characteristics in three steps using multivariate logistic regression models.

resultsWe found 65% of women reported being informed about breast cancer while 35% did not. Having a trusted person with whom to discuss cancer concerns, having a lower versus higher perceived risk of breast cancer, having undergone genetic counseling, and being satisfied with physician discussions about breast cancer in their families were predictors of being informed about breast cancer.

conclusionsAlthough acquiring objective risk information, such as through genetic counseling, may contribute to a basic level of understanding, communication with providers and within other trusted relationships appears to be an essential component in women's reporting they had all the information they need to talk with their daughters about breast cancer.

Indexed as

CommunicationGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseNuclear FamilyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsRisk FactorsSelf ReportSocial SupportSurveys and Questionnairesbreast cancerfamily communicationgenetic counselinginformation managementoncologyrisk communication

Identifiers

PMID29377785
PMCPMC5955805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.