Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29377409›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2018

Diminishing benefit of smoking cessation medications during the first year: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Laura J Rosen, Tal Galili, Jeffrey Kott, Mark Goodman, Laurence S Freedman

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04088942 phase4withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Open-label, Superiority, Multicenter, Two-arm Intervention Study of the Effect of "High-intensity" vs. 'Low-intensity' Smoking Cessation Intervention in Active Smokers With COPD

TypeinterventionalSponsorPradeesh SivapalanRan2023 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Smoking Cessation, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsHigh-intensity smoking cessation intervention, Low-intensity smoking cessation intervention
NCT06218056 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Efficacy of Cannabidiol for Reducing Cigarette Use

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2024 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsTobacco Use Disorder, Tobacco Smoking, Tobacco DependenceArmsCannabidiol (CBD) 800 mg, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Study Characteristics Influence the Efficacy of Substance Abuse Treatments: A Meta-analysis of Medications for Smoking Cessation.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Nicotine dependence and insula subregions: functional connectivity and cue-induced activation.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  7. No controversy: e-cigarettes are not a treatment for tobacco/nicotine cessation.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2022
    Article
  8. Electronic Cigarettes: A Pro-Con Review of the Current Literature.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Self-Administration of Cotinine in Wistar Rats: Comparisons to Nicotine.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Defining and Measuring Abstinence in Clinical Trials of Smoking Cessation Interventions: An Updated Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Vape Gods and Judaism-E-cigarettes and Jewish Law.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura J RosenDepartment of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2087-0508
Tal GaliliDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, The Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0046-7332
Jeffrey KottNew York State/American Program, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2397-0996
Mark GoodmanNew York State/American Program, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5504-4156
Laurence S FreedmanDepartment of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-7900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAlthough smoking cessation medications have shown effectiveness in increasing abstinence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is unclear to what extent benefits persist over time. This paper assesses whether the benefits of smoking cessation medications decline over the first year.

methodsWe selected studies from three systematic reviews published by the Cochrane Collaboration. RCTs of first-line smoking cessation medications, with 6- and 12-month follow-up, were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis was used to synthesize information on sustained abstinence (SA) at 6 versus 12 months and 3 versus 6 months, using the risk difference (RD) ('net benefit') between intervention and control group quit rates, the relative risk (RR) and the odds ratio (OR).

resultsSixty-one studies (27 647 participants) were included. Fewer than 40% of intervention group participants were sustained abstinent at 3 months (bupropion: 37.1%; nicotine replacement therapy (NRT): 34.8%; varenicline: 39.3%); approximately a quarter were sustained abstinent at 6 months (bupropion: 25.9%; NRT: 26.6%; varenicline: 25.4%), and approximately a fifth were sustained abstinent at 12 months (bupropion: 19.9%; NRT: 19.8%%; varenicline: 18.7%). There was only a small decline in RR (3 months: 1.95 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.74-2.18, P < 0.0001]; 6 months: 1.87 (95% CI = 1.67-2.08 P < 0.0001); 12 months: 1.75 (95% CI = 1.56-1.95, P < 0.0001) between intervention and control groups over time, but a substantial decline in net benefit [3 months: RD = 17.3% (14.5-20.1%); 6 months: RD = 11.8% (10.0-13.7%); 12 months: RD = 8.2% (6.8-9.6%)]. The decline in net benefit was statistically significant between 3 and 6 [RD = 4.95% (95% CI = 3.49-6.41%), P < 0.0001] and 6 and 12 months [RD = 3.00% (95% CI = 2.36%-3.64%), P < 0.0001)] for medications combined and individual medications.

conclusionsThe proportion of smokers who use smoking cessation medications who benefit from doing so decreases during the course of the first year, but a net benefit still remains at 12 months.

Indexed as

Tobacco Use Cessation DevicesBupropionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking Cessation AgentsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVareniclineBupropionSmoking Cessation AgentsVareniclineBupropion (Zyban)cessation medicationsmeta-analysisnicotine replacement therapy (NRT)sustained abstinencevarenicline (Chantix, Champix)

Identifiers

PMID29377409
PMCPMC5947828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.