Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29376827›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Activating the regenerative potential of Müller glia cells in a regeneration-deficient retina.

Katharina Lust, Joachim Wittbrodt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mesenchymal-derived neural progenitors underlie localbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Regeneration in fish, with special focus on killifishes.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. New pathways to neurogenesis: Insights from injury-induced retinal regeneration.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Retina regeneration: lessons from vertebrates.Oxford open neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Yap Regulates Müller Glia Reprogramming in Damaged Zebrafish Retinas.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharina LustCentre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-5492
Joachim WittbrodtCentre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-7377
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

European Research Council 294354European Research Council Advanced Grant 294354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration responses in animals are widespread across phyla. To identify molecular players that confer regenerative capacities to non-regenerative species is of key relevance for basic research and translational approaches. Here, we report a differential response in retinal regeneration between medaka (

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsCell ProliferationCellular ReprogrammingEpendymoglial CellsOryziasRetinaZebrafishdevelopmental biologyin vivo imaginglineage tracingmedakaMüller glia cellsretina regenerationSox2stem cellszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID29376827
PMCPMC5815849
OpenAlexW2750414369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.