Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29376822›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Suppression and facilitation of human neural responses.

Michael-Paul Schallmo, Alexander M Kale, Rachel Millin, Anastasia V Flevaris, Zoran Brkanac, Richard Ae Edden, Raphael A Bernier, Scott O Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Distinct Biotypes of Visual Perception in Major Depressive Disorder.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael-Paul SchallmoDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-8607
Alexander M KaleDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7668-2800
Rachel MillinDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Anastasia V FlevarisDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Zoran BrkanacDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Richard Ae EddenDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Raphael A BernierDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Scott O MurrayDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.

Funding

TR&D 4: Algorithms for functional and anatomical brain analysisP41EB015909 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2012 to 2020
$13.1M
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOHERTY, DANIEL · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
VISUAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32EY007031 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Wyeth Daniel Bair, Anitha Pasupathy · 1985 to 2026
$6.1M
Universal GABA-edited MRS at 3TR01EB016089 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard Anthony Edward Edden · 2013 to 2026
$5.4M
Inhibitory dysfunction in autismR01MH106520 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MURRAY, SCOTT O · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
Defining separate mechanisms of surround suppression in human visual cortexF32EY025121 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SCHALLMO, MICHAEL-PAUL · 2015 to 2017
$110k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY025121NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007031NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015909NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016089NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient neural processing depends on regulating responses through suppression and facilitation of neural activity. Utilizing a well-known visual motion paradigm that evokes behavioral suppression and facilitation, and combining five different methodologies (behavioral psychophysics, computational modeling, functional MRI, pharmacology, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy), we provide evidence that challenges commonly held assumptions about the neural processes underlying suppression and facilitation. We show that: (1) both suppression and facilitation can emerge from a single, computational principle - divisive normalization; there is no need to invoke separate neural mechanisms, (2) neural suppression and facilitation in the motion-selective area MT mirror perception, but strong suppression also occurs in earlier visual areas, and (3) suppression is not primarily driven by GABA-mediated inhibition. Thus, while commonly used spatial suppression paradigms may provide insight into neural response magnitudes in visual areas, they should not be used to infer neural inhibition.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural InhibitionPhysical StimulationAdultBehaviorFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleVisual CortexYoung AdultGABAhumanmotion perceptionMTneurosciencenormalizationspatial visionsurround suppression

Identifiers

PMID29376822
PMCPMC5812713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.