SynthesisThe British journal of radiology2018
The diagnostic accuracy of cross-sectional imaging for detecting acute scaphoid fractures in children: a systematic review.
Synthesis in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiological Diagnosis of Suspected Scaphoid Fractures in Children: A Systematic Review.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Understanding Pediatric Clinical Scaphoid Injuries: A Prospective Radiological Study.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of cross-sectional imaging for the diagnosis of acute scaphoid fractures in children.
methodsA systematic review of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases between 1980 and July 2017 was independently performed by two observers. Criteria for study inclusion in a meta-analysis and assessment of the quality of such studies using the QADAS tool, were predetermined.
resultsNo studies were eligible for inclusion in a meta-analysis. Three studies (of low quality when assessed against the STARD guidelines for reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy) assessed MRI (performed between Days 2 and 10 after acute injury) for the diagnosis of scaphoid fractures in a total of 119 children (age range 6 to 16 years). Study 1 (45 children) reported inter-observer reliability of radiographs and MRI of 0.53 and 0.95 respectively. Study 3 (18 children) reported a negative predictive value of MRI (even as early as Day 2), of 100%. No measure of diagnostic accuracy or observer reliability was reported in Study 2 (56 children). In all 3 studies, MRI identified more scaphoid fractures (and other carpal injuries) than radiographs. Study 3 showed that follow-up MRI between Days 38 and 45 added no new information compared to initial MRI.
conclusionBased on a systematic review of the literature, there is currently no evidence on which to suggest an imaging protocol for suspected scaphoid fracture in children. Until such evidence is available, existing guidelines (which are based on findings from adult studies) should be followed. Advances in knowledge: (1) There is low quality evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of cross-sectional imaging for suspected scaphoid fractures in children and no evidence on which to propose an optimal imaging strategy. (2) Until such evidence is available, current guidelines (based predominantly on findings in adults and expert opinion) should be followed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.