ArticleScientific reports2018
Corrigendum: Application of Machine-Learning Models to Predict Tacrolimus Stable Dose in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The application of artificial intelligence in systemic lupus erythematosus: a bibliometric analysis of current trends and future directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Analytical Models to Optimize Tacrolimus Dosing in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- A framework for integrating artificial intelligence for clinical care with continuous therapeutic monitoring.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- The Role of Vitamin D Metabolism Genes and Their Genomic Background in Shaping Cyclosporine A Dosage Parameters after Kidney Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Developing supervised machine learning algorithms to evaluate the therapeutic effect and laboratory-related adverse events of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in renal transplants.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/srep42192.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.