Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29376326›Full record

ReviewACS chemical biology2018

Design and Application of Sensors for Chemical Cytometry.

Brianna M Vickerman, Matthew M Anttila, Brae V Petersen, Nancy L Allbritton, David S Lawrence

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brianna M VickermanDepartment of Chemistry , The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , North Carolina 27599 , United States.
Matthew M AnttilaDepartment of Chemistry , The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , North Carolina 27599 , United States.
Brae V PetersenDepartment of Chemistry , The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , North Carolina 27599 , United States.
Nancy L AllbrittonDepartment of Chemistry , The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , North Carolina 27599 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9242-768X
David S LawrenceDepartment of Chemistry , The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , North Carolina 27599 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0901-1617
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Single-Cell Measurement of Lipid Signaling in Colorectal CancerR01CA177993 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ALLBRITTON, NANCY L. · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
Single Cell Sampling of Signaling Activity in Triple Negative Breast CancerR01CA203032 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LAWRENCE, DAVID S. · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177993NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bulk cell population response to a stimulus, be it a growth factor or a cytotoxic agent, neglects the cell-to-cell variability that can serve as a friend or as a foe in human biology. Biochemical variations among closely related cells furnish the basis for the adaptability of the immune system but also act as the root cause of resistance to chemotherapy by tumors. Consequently, the ability to probe for the presence of key biochemical variables at the single-cell level is now recognized to be of significant biological and biomedical impact. Chemical cytometry has emerged as an ultrasensitive single-cell platform with the flexibility to measure an array of cellular components, ranging from metabolite concentrations to enzyme activities. We briefly review the various chemical cytometry strategies, including recent advances in reporter design, probe and metabolite separation, and detection instrumentation. We also describe strategies for improving intracellular delivery, biochemical specificity, metabolic stability, and detection sensitivity of probes. Recent applications of these strategies to small molecules, lipids, proteins, and other analytes are discussed. Finally, we assess the current scope and limitations of chemical cytometry and discuss areas for future development to meet the needs of single-cell research.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorDrug DesignElectrophoresis, CapillaryFluorescent DyesHumansSingle-Cell AnalysisFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID29376326
PMCPMC6061971
OpenAlexW2784909629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.