ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2018
Quantification of uncertainty in the assessment of coronary plaque in CCTA through a dynamic cardiac phantom and 3D-printed plaque model.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating acoustic and thermal properties of a plaque phantom.Journal of ultrasound · 2024Article
- Biomimicking Atherosclerotic Vessels: A Relevant and (Yet) Sub-Explored Topic.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Impact of the confluence of cardiac motion and high spatial resolution on performance of ECG-gated imaging with an investigational photon-counting CT system: A phantom study.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2023Article
- Non-invasive technologies for heart failure, systolic and diastolic dysfunction modeling: a scoping review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Investigating atherosclerotic plaque phantoms for ultrasound therapy.Journal of ultrasound · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Coronary Plaques and Stents with Conventional and Photon-counting CT: Benefits of High-Resolution Photon-counting CT.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2021Article
- Precise measurement of coronary stenosis diameter with CCTA using CT number calibration.Medical physics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a dynamic physical cardiac phantom with a realistic coronary plaque to investigate stenosis measurement accuracy under clinically relevant heart-rates. The coronary plaque model (5 mm diameter, 50% stenosis, and 32 mm long) was designed and 3D-printed with tissue equivalent materials (calcified plaque with iodine-enhanced lumen). Realistic cardiac motion was modeled by converting computational cardiac motion vectors into compression and rotation profiles executed by a commercial base cardiac phantom. The phantom was imaged on a dual-source CT system applying a retrospective gated coronary CT angiography (CCTA) protocol using synthesized motion-synchronized electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms. Multiplanar reformatted images were reconstructed along vessel centerlines. Enhanced lumens were segmented by five independent operators. On average, stenosis measurement accuracy was 0.9% positively biased for the motion-free condition. Average measurement accuracy monotonically decreased from 0.9% positive bias for the motion-free condition to 18.5% negative bias at 90 beats per minute. Contrast-to-noise ratio, lumen circularity, and segmentation conformity also decreased monotonically with increasing heart-rate. These results demonstrate successful implementation of a base cardiac phantom with a 3D-printed coronary plaque model, relevant motion profile, and coordinated ECG waveform. They further show the utility of the model to ascertain metrics of CCTA accuracy and image quality under realistic plaque, motion, and acquisition conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.