ArticleBioMed research international2017
First-Line
Article in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2026.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Guideline
- Guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan: 2024 revised edition.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Guideline
- Transversus abdominis plane block versus port site anesthetic in adult laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Helicobacter pylori Management in Older Adults: Current Perspectives From Japan.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
- Declining eradication rates ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Review
- Stem cell sources from human biological waste material: a role for the umbilical cord and dental pulp stem cells for regenerative medicine.Human cell · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsPatients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and
methodsA total of 758 patients with
resultsThe eradication rates attained by the CKD and non-CKD groups were 85.4% and 85.7%, respectively, in the per-protocol analysis (
conclusionsThis study suggests that the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.