Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29375791›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2018

Impact of long-term chromosomal shuffling on the multispecies coalescent analysis of two anthropoid primate lineages.

Carlos G Schrago, Beatriz Mello, Anieli G Pereira, Carolina Furtado, Hector N Seuánez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos G SchragoDepartment of Genetics Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6257-8906
Beatriz MelloDepartment of Genetics Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4511-2757
Anieli G PereiraDepartment of Genetics Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil.
Carolina FurtadoDivision of Genetics National Cancer Institute Rio de Janeiro Brazil.
Hector N SeuánezDepartment of Genetics Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3355-8003
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRHospital do Câncer III · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multispecies coalescent (MSC) theory assumes that gene trees inferred from individual loci are independent trials of the MSC process. As genes might be physically close in syntenic associations spanning along chromosome regions, these assumptions might be flawed in evolutionary lineages with substantial karyotypic shuffling. Neotropical primates (NP) represent an ideal case for assessing the performance of MSC methods in such scenarios because chromosome diploid number varies significantly in this lineage. To this end, we investigated the effect of sequence length on the theoretical expectations of MSC model, as well as the results of coalescent-based tree inference methods. This was carried out by comparing NP with hominids, a lineage in which chromosome macrostructure has been stable for at least 15 million years. We found that departure from the MSC model in Neotropical primates decreased with smaller sequence fragments, where sites sharing the same evolutionary history were more frequently found than in longer fragments. This scenario probably resulted from extensive karyotypic rearrangement occurring during the radiation of NP, contrary to the comparatively stable chromosome evolution in hominids.

Indexed as

divergence timeskaryotypic evolutionmultispecies coalescentrecombinationspecies tree

Identifiers

PMID29375791
PMCPMC5773316
OpenAlexW2780871393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.