Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29375748›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2018

Comparison between laparoscopic and open surgery for large gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A meta-analysis.

Jian-Xin Cui, Yun-He Gao, Hong-Qing Xi, Ai-Zhen Cai, Ke-Cheng Zhang, Ji-Yang Li, Bo Wei, Lin Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Updated Asian consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (2025).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jian-Xin CuiDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Yun-He GaoDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Hong-Qing XiDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Ai-Zhen CaiDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Ke-Cheng ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Ji-Yang LiDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Bo WeiDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Lin ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNCreative Research Enterprises (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate whether laparoscopic surgery is as safe and feasible as open resection for patients with larger gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (≥ 5 cm).

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library database was performed. Relevant studies of laparoscopic and open surgery for GISTs of > 5 cm published before December 2016 were identified from these databases. The quality of the studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The tumor size, operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, complication rate, and disease-free survival rate were assessed. The software Stata (version 12.0) was used for the meta-analysis.

resultsFive clinical trials comprising 209 patients with GISTs of similar larger sizes were evaluated. The pooled analysis of 100 patients in the laparoscopic resection group and 109 patients in the open resection group demonstrated that laparoscopic surgery was significantly associated with a shorter postoperative hospital stay (

conclusionOur findings revealed that for patients with large GISTs of comparable sizes, laparoscopic surgery did not significantly influence the operation factors or clinical outcomes compared with open surgery. This suggests that laparoscopic resection is as acceptable as open surgery for treatment of large gastric GISTs.

Indexed as

Clinical outcomeGastrointestinal stromal tumorLaparoscopic resectionMeta-analysisOpen resection

Identifiers

PMID29375748
PMCPMC5767793
OpenAlexW2783037554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.