Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29375696›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018

Epidemiological study of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in subjects with abnormal cytological findings in cervical cancer screening.

Weizhi You, Shaocong Li, Ran Du, Jizeng Zheng, Aifang Shen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. LINC00511 promotes cervical cancer progression by regulating the miR-497-5p/MAPK1 axis.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Weizhi YouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, P.R. China.
Shaocong LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, P.R. China.
Ran DuDepartment of Pathology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, P.R. China.
Jizeng ZhengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liaocheng Third People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, P.R. China.
Aifang ShenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, P.R. China.
Liaocheng People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the genotype and age distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) and evaluate HPV-DNA in subjects with abnormal cervical cytology results by using crowd-based cervical cancer screening cytology data. The Thinprep liquid-based cytologic test (TCT) was performed from January 2013 to January 2014 in the permanent residents of Liaocheng (China) aged 21-65 years who were married or had sexual intercourse. The number of screened women totaled 20,017, among whom 937 had abnormal results, 785 of which were recalled. For subjects in the age range of 21-65 years, an HR-HPV typing test using the fluorescence hybridization method. Among the 785 cases with abnormal TCT findings, repeated testing identified atypical squamous cells of unknown significance/atypical glandular cells in 478, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in 175, high squamous intraepithelial lesions in 127 and squamous cell carcinoma/adenocarcinoma in 5 cases. Among these types, infection rates of HR-HPV were 50.2, 77.1, 89.0 and 100%, respectively. Of the 785 cases with abnormal TCT results, 493 (62.8%) were HR-HPV-positive. A total of 16 types of HR-HPV were detected: HPV-16, -18, -31, -33, -35, -39, -45, -51-53, -56, -58, -59, -66, 68 and 73. Subjects infected with ≥2 types were defined as having a multi-type infection. The infection rate was high in the age groups of 26-30 and 51-55 years, accounting for 87.7% (71/81) and 79.7% (51/64), respectively, while it was lower in the >55 years group at 28.6% (14/54). The top five types of HR-HPV (stated in a decreasing order regarding positivity rate) were HPV16 (21.5%, 169/785), HPV52 (12.2%, 96/785), HPV58 (9.8%, 77/785), HPV33 (9.7%, 76/785) and HPV18 (7.5%, 59/785). Single-type infection was encountered in 45.0% (353/785) and multi-type infection in 17.8% (140/785), among which 98 cases had a two-type infection, 37 had a three-type infection, 2 had a four-type infection, 2 had a five-type infection and 1 case had a six-type infection. In the present study, differences in multi-type HR-HPV infection between groups with different TCT results were statistically significant. In conclusion, compared with CTC screening on its own, complementary HR-HPV testing is an effective method for screening for cervical cancer. The infection rate of HPV16, -52, -58, -33 and -18 was high among patients with cervical cytological abnormalities. Multi-type infection adds to the risk of malignancies. In Liaocheng, high-risk groups were aged 26-30 and 51-55. Attention should be paid during the screening and follow-up visits of these groups.

Indexed as

epidemiologyhuman papillomavirusliquid-based cytology testuterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29375696
PMCPMC5763653
OpenAlexW2767196060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.