ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Treatment of glaucomatous optic nerve damage using ginsenoside Rg1 mediated by ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Treatment of Glaucoma with Natural Products and Their Mechanism of Action: An Update.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Protective effect of ultrasound microbubble combined with gross saponins ofAnnals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Ginseng for an eye: effects of ginseng on ocular diseases.Journal of ginseng research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of glaucomatous optic nervedamage using ginsenoside Rg1 mediated by ultrasound targeted microbubbles destruction was evaluated. Thirty healthy New Zealand white rabbits were subjected to injection of 0.3% carbomer solution to establish glaucomatous optic nerve damage model. Rabbits were divided into 5 groups: control group, model group, model group + intravitreal injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) group, model group + intravitreal injection of ginsenoside Rg1 group (Rg1 group), model group + intravitreal injection of ginsenoside Rg1 + ultrasound microbubble group (ultrasound group), model group + ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction (ultrasound group). Intraocular pressures were compared at 1, 2 and 4 weeks after model establishment. Rabbits were sacrificed 4 weeks after model establishment to collect retinal tissue for H&E staining. Histological changes were observed and the retinal thickness was measured. Contents of malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and nitric oxide (NO) were measured by ELISA. Intraocular pressure was significantly higher in model group than in control group at 1 week (P<0.05). Intraocular pressure was significantly lower in the ultrasound group than in NGF group and Rg1 group at all time-points (P<0.05). The number of ganglion cells in model group was decreased significantly. Number of nuclear layer cells was significantly reduced. Thickest retina was found in control group and model group was the thinnest (P<0.05). Contents of MDA and NO in model group were significantly higher than those in NCF group and Rg1 group. SOD content in control group was higher than that in ultrasound group and model group (P<0.05). In conclusion, treatment of glaucomatous optic nerve damage using ginsenoside Rg1 mediated by ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction can reduce the level of oxidative stress, relieve intraocular pressure and reduce ganglion cell damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.