Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29375624›Full record

ReviewStem cells international2017

Cell Therapy for Refractory Angina: A Reappraisal.

Beatrice Bassetti, Patrizia Nigro, Valentina Catto, Laura Cavallotti, Stefano Righetti, Felice Achilli, Paolo Scacciatella, Corrado Carbucicchio, Giulio Pompilio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Beatrice BassettiUnità di Biologia Vascolare e Medicina Rigenerativa, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Via Carlo Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy.
Patrizia NigroUnità di Biologia Vascolare e Medicina Rigenerativa, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Via Carlo Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1658-5301
Valentina CattoCardiac Arrhythmia Research Centre, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Via Carlo Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy.
Laura CavallottiUnità Operativa Cardiochirurgia, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Via Carlo Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy.
Stefano RighettiUnità Operativa Cardiologia e UTIC, Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, Via G. B. Pergolesi 33, 20052 Monza, Italy.
Felice AchilliUnità Operativa Cardiologia e UTIC, Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, Via G. B. Pergolesi 33, 20052 Monza, Italy.
Paolo ScacciatellaDipartimento Cardiovascolare e Toracico, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Corso Bramante 88, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Corrado CarbucicchioCardiac Arrhythmia Research Centre, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Via Carlo Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy.
Giulio PompilioUnità di Biologia Vascolare e Medicina Rigenerativa, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Via Carlo Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2581-5735
Centro Cardiologico Monzino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac cell-based therapy has emerged as a novel therapeutic option for patients dealing with untreatable refractory angina (RA). However, after more than a decade of controlled studies, no definitive consensus has been reached regarding clinical efficacy. Although positive results in terms of surrogate endpoints have been suggested by early and phase II clinical studies as well as by meta-analyses, the more recent reports lacked the provision of definitive response in terms of hard clinical endpoints. Regrettably, pivotal trials designed to conclusively determine the efficacy of cell-based therapeutics in such a challenging clinical condition are therefore still missing. Considering this, a comprehensive reappraisal of cardiac cell-based therapy role in RA seems warranted and timely, since a number of crucial cell- and patient-related aspects need to be systematically analysed. As an example, the large variability in efficacy endpoint selection appears to be a limiting factor for the advancement of cardiac cell-based therapy in the field. This review will provide an overview of the key elements that may have influenced the results of cell-based trials in the context of RA, focusing in particular on the understanding at which the extent of angina-related endpoints may predict cell-based therapeutic efficacy.

Identifiers

PMID29375624
PMCPMC5742462
OpenAlexW2773957131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.