ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017
Current Knowledge and Computational Techniques for Grapevine Meta-Omics Analysis.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-genome re-sequencing, diversity analysis, and stress-resistance analysis of 77 grape rootstock genotypes.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Interaction between bacterial endophytes and host plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- The Mycorrizal Status in Vineyards Affected by Esca.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Identification of Selective Sweeps in the Domesticated Table and Wine Grape (Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Insight Into the Microbial Co-occurrence and Diversity of 73 Grapevine (Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Bioactive Products From Plant-Endophytic Gram-Positive Bacteria.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Metagenomic Approaches to Investigate the Contribution of the Vineyard Environment to the Quality of Wine Fermentation: Potentials and Difficulties.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing grapevine (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.