Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29375525›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2017

Applications for Bacteriophage Therapy during Pregnancy and the Perinatal Period.

Lucy L Furfaro, Barbara J Chang, Matthew S Payne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Treating bacterial infections with bacteriophages in the 21st century.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Phage Therapy in Livestock and Companion Animals.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucy L FurfaroDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Barbara J ChangMarshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Matthew S PayneDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnant women and their unborn children are a population that is particularly vulnerable to bacterial infection. Physiological changes that occur during pregnancy affect the way women respond to such infections and the options that clinicians have for treatment. Antibiotics are still considered the best option for active infections and a suitable prophylaxis for prevention of potential infections, such as vaginal/rectal

Indexed as

antenatalantibiotic prophylaxisbacterial infectionsbacteriophagesfetusperinatalphage therapypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29375525
PMCPMC5768649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.