Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29375201›Full record

ArticleCurrent directions in psychological science2017

Influences of background noise on infants and children.

Lucy C Erickson, Rochelle S Newman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current directions in psychological science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Infants and Adults Use Visual Cues to Improve Detection and Discrimination of Speech in Noise.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Screen Time Is More than Just the Screen: Indirect Media Exposure Dominates Infants' Digital Environments.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Children's use of spatial and visual cues for release from perceptual masking.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Noise-induced differences in the complexity of spoken language.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucy C EricksonUniversity of Maryland, College Park.
Rochelle S NewmanUniversity of Maryland, College Park.

Funding

Toddlers listening and learning in noise: distraction vs. signal degradationR01HD081127 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI NEWMAN, ROCHELLE S · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this review is to provide a high-level, selected overview of the consequences of background noise on health, perception, cognition, and learning during early development, with a specific focus on how noise may impair speech comprehension and language learning (e.g., via masking). Although much of the existing literature has focused on adults, research shows that infants and young children are relatively disadvantaged at listening in noise. Consequently, a major goal is to consider how background noise may affect young children, who must learn and develop language in noisy environments despite being simultaneously less equipped to do so.

Indexed as

background noiseeffects of noise on childrennoise in children’s environments

Identifiers

PMID29375201
PMCPMC5784839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.