ReviewAustralian prescriber2017
Functional dyspepsia.
Review in Australian prescriber, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Acupuncture as an Add-On Treatment for Functional Dyspepsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Gastric cancer secondary prevention in dyspeptic patients.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Findings in Patients Presenting Dyspepsia: A Population-Based Study in Mashhad, North East of Iran.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Tegoprazan in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-arm Study.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2024Article
- Functional gastrointestinal disorders among healthcare professionals at a tertiary Australian hospital.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Article
- MODERN APPROACH TO DYSPEPSIA.Acta clinica Croatica · 2021Review
- Rome III, Rome IV, and Potential Asia Symptom Criteria for Functional Dyspepsia Do Not Reliably Distinguish Functional From Organic Disease.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2020Observational
- Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Dyspepsia in Korea.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2020Review
- Physiological Effect of Ghrelin on Body Systems.International journal of endocrinology · 2020Review
- Functional Dyspepsia in the Elderly.Current gastroenterology reports · 2019Review
- Functional gastrointestinal disorders negatively affect health-related quality of life in MS.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2019Article
- Comparison of Small Gut and Whole Gut Microbiota of First-Degree Relatives With Adult Celiac Disease Patients and Controls.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Personalized management in functional gastrointestinal disorders based on genomics: hope at last or just feigned praise?Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Effects of sumac aqueous extract along with eating and drinking modification on functional dyspepsia symptoms in comparison with omeprazole: An open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial.Avicenna journal of phytomedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.