Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29375139›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2018

Post-exposure treatments for Ebola and Marburg virus infections.

Robert W Cross, Chad E Mire, Heinz Feldmann, Thomas W Geisbert

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Marburg and Sudan virus outbreaks: are we any closer to a pan-filovirus vaccine?Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Marburg Virus Medical Countermeasures.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert W CrossDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas 77555, USA.
Chad E MireDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas 77555, USA.
Heinz FeldmannLaboratory of Virology, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana 59840, USA.
Thomas W GeisbertDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas 77555, USA.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Supplemental Research Project (SRP)U19AI109711 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GEISBERT, THOMAS WILLIAM · 2014 to 2018
$26.6M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI109711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The filoviruses - Ebola virus and Marburg virus - cause lethal haemorrhagic fever in humans and non-human primates (NHPs). Filoviruses present a global health threat both as naturally acquired diseases and as potential agents of bioterrorism. In the recent 2013-2016 outbreak of Ebola virus, the most promising therapies for post-exposure use with demonstrated efficacy in the gold-standard NHP models of filovirus disease were unable to show statistically significant protection in patients infected with Ebola virus. This Review briefly discusses these failures and what has been learned from these experiences, and summarizes the current status of post-exposure medical countermeasures in development, including antibodies, small interfering RNA and small molecules. We outline how our current knowledge could be applied to the identification of novel interventions and ways to use interventions more effectively.

Identifiers

PMID29375139
OpenAlexW2787698206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.