Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29374859›Full record

SynthesisDrugs & aging2018

Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Interventions to Reduce Antipsychotic and Benzodiazepine Use Within Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review.

Daniel J Hoyle, Ivan K Bindoff, Lisa M Clinnick, Gregory M Peterson, Juanita L Westbury

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs & aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J HoylePharmacy, School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 26, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia. Daniel.Hoyle@utas.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2867-3736
Ivan K BindoffPharmacy, School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 26, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8170-8339
Lisa M ClinnickSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, PO Box 650, Ballarat, VIC, 3350, Australia.
Gregory M PetersonPharmacy, School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 26, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6764-3882
Juanita L WestburyWicking Dementia Research & Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 143, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9932-9513
University of Tasmania · AUAustralian Catholic University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntipsychotic and benzodiazepine medications are widely used in nursing homes despite only modest efficacy and the risk of severe adverse effects. Numerous interventions have been implemented to reduce their use. However, the outcomes for the residents and staff and the economic impact on the healthcare system remain relatively understudied.

objectiveThe aim was to examine the clinical and economic outcomes reported within interventions to reduce antipsychotic and/or benzodiazepine use in nursing homes.

methodsDatabases searched included PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Scopus, and ProQuest. We focussed on interventions with professional (e.g. education) and/or organisational (e.g. formation of multidisciplinary teams) components. Data were extracted from the papers that included clinical and/or economic outcomes. Two authors independently reviewed articles for eligibility and quality.

resultsFourteen studies reported on clinical outcomes for the residents: 13 antipsychotic reduction studies and one study focussing exclusively on benzodiazepine reduction. There was substantial heterogeneity in the types of outcomes reported and the method of reporting. Change in behavioural and psychological symptoms was the most commonly reported outcome throughout the antipsychotic reduction interventions (n = 12 studies) and remained stable or improved in ten of 12 studies. Whilst improvements were seen in emotional responsiveness, measures of sleep, cognitive function, and subjective health score remained unchanged upon benzodiazepine reduction. No interventions included an economic analysis.

conclusionsEfforts should be made to improve the consistency in reporting of clinical outcomes within interventions to reduce antipsychotic and/or benzodiazepine medications. Additionally, the economic impact of these interventions should be considered. Nonetheless, evidence suggests that interventions that reduce antipsychotic use are unlikely to have deleterious clinical effects. The clinical and economic effects of benzodiazepine reduction remain under-reported.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesDrug UtilizationHumansNursing HomesPsychomotor AgitationTreatment OutcomeAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepines

Identifiers

PMID29374859
OpenAlexW2786714372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.