Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29374788›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2018

Intraspecific and intraorganismal copy number dynamics of retrotransposons and tandem repeat in Aegilops speltoides Tausch (Poaceae, Triticeae).

Imad Shams, Olga Raskina

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rapid DNA-FISH in Arabidopsis thaliana Somatic Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The Influence of Edaphic Factors on DNA Damage and Repair in Wild WheatInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. qPCR as a Selective Tool for Cytogenetics.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Long Tandem Arrays ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Copy Number Variation of Transposable Elements inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  11. Evolution of the S-Genomes inFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Imad ShamsInstitute of Evolution and Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Aba-Hushi Avenue 199, 3498838, Haifa, Mount Carmel, Israel.
Olga RaskinaInstitute of Evolution and Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Aba-Hushi Avenue 199, 3498838, Haifa, Mount Carmel, Israel. raskina@research.haifa.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4994-0856
University of Haifa · IL

Funding

Israel Science Foundation 723/07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposable elements (TE) and tandem repeats (TR) compose the largest fraction of the plant genome. The abundance and repatterning of repetitive DNA underlie intrapopulation polymorphisms and intraspecific diversification; however, the dynamics of repetitive elements in ontogenesis is not fully understood. Here, we addressed the genotype-specific and tissue-specific abundances and dynamics of the Ty1-copia, Ty3-gypsy, and LINE retrotransposons and species-specific Spelt1 tandem repeat in wild diploid goatgrass, Aegilops speltoides Tausch. Copy numbers of TEs and TR were estimated by real-time quantitative PCR in vegetative and generative tissues in original plants from contrasting allopatric populations and artificial intraspecific hybrids. The results showed that between leaves and somatic spike tissues as well as in progressive microsporogenesis of individual genotypes, the copy numbers of three TEs correlatively oscillated between 2- to 4-fold and the TR copy numbers fluctuated by 18- to 440-fold. Inter-individual and intraorganismal TEs and TR copy number dynamics demonstrate large-scale parallelism with extensive chromosomal rearrangements that were detected using fluorescent in situ hybridization in parental and hybrid genotypes. The data obtained indicate that tissue-specific differences in the abundance and pattern of repetitive sequences emerge during cell proliferation and differentiation in ontogenesis and reflect the reorganization of individual genomes in changing environments, especially in small peripheral population(s) under the influence of rapid climatic changes.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantGenome, PlantPoaceaeRetroelementsTandem Repeat SequencesRetroelementsAegilops speltoidesGenome evolutionIntraspecific hybridizationRepetitive DNARetrotransposon copy numbersTandem repeats

Identifiers

PMID29374788
OpenAlexW2789812936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.