Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29374661›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.

Qingqing Mao, Melissa Jay, Jana L Hoffman, Jacob Calvert, Christopher Barton, David Shimabukuro, Lisa Shieh, Uli Chettipally, Grant Fletcher, Yaniv Kerem and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 150 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03734484 phase2withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Gram Type Infection-Specific Sepsis Identification Using Machine Learning

TypeinterventionalSponsorDascenaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsSepsis, Severe Sepsis, Septic ShockArmsInSight
NCT03752489 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Unsupervised Machine Learning for Clustering of Septic Patients to Determine Optimal Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorDascenaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled51,645ConditionsSepsis, Severe Sepsis, Septic ShockArmsTreatment-specific InSight, InSight
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic performance of machine-learning algorithms for sepsis prediction: An updated meta-analysis.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Qingqing MaoDascena Inc., Hayward, California, USA.
Melissa JayDascena Inc., Hayward, California, USA.
Jana L HoffmanDascena Inc., Hayward, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7745-3900
Jacob CalvertDascena Inc., Hayward, California, USA.
Christopher BartonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
David ShimabukuroDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Lisa ShiehDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Uli ChettipallyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Grant FletcherDivision of Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Yaniv KeremDepartment of Clinical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Yifan ZhouDascena Inc., Hayward, California, USA.
Ritankar DasDascena Inc., Hayward, California, USA.

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe validate a machine learning-based sepsis-prediction algorithm (

designA machine-learning algorithm with gradient tree boosting. Features for prediction were created from combinations of six vital sign measurements and their changes over time.

settingA mixed-ward retrospective dataset from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center (San Francisco, California, USA) as the primary source, an intensive care unit dataset from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) as a transfer-learning source and four additional institutions' datasets to evaluate generalisability.

participants684 443 total encounters, with 90 353 encounters from June 2011 to March 2016 at UCSF.

interventionsNone. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for detection and prediction of sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock.

resultsFor detection of sepsis and severe sepsis,

conclusions

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningVital SignsAdolescentAdultAgedArea Under CurveBostonDatabases, FactualEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleClinical Decision SupportElectronic Health RecordsMachine LearningPredictionSepsisSeptic Shock

Identifiers

PMID29374661
PMCPMC5829820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.