Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29374526›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2018

Small sustainable monetary incentives versus charitable donations to promote exercise: Rationale, design, and baseline data from a randomized pilot study.

David M Williams, Harold H Lee, Lauren Connell, Holly Boyle, Jessica Emerson, Kelley Strohacker, Omar Galárraga

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial ProtocolComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Small sustainable monetary donation-based incentives to promote physical activity: A randomized controlled trial.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Moving the Dial on Heart Failure Patient Adherence Rates.Patient preference and adherence · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David M WilliamsBrown University School of Public Health, USA. Electronic address: david_m_williams@brown.edu.
Harold H LeeBrown University School of Public Health, USA.
Lauren ConnellBrown University School of Public Health, USA.
Holly BoyleBrown University School of Public Health, USA.
Jessica EmersonBrown University School of Public Health, USA.
Kelley StrohackerUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Omar GalárragaBrown University School of Public Health, USA.
John Brown University · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

Spatial Analysis CoreR24HD041020 · NICHD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI LOGAN, JOHN R · 2001 to 2016
$7.4M
Training in Behavioral & Preventive MedicineT32HL076134 · NHLBI · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI John Graham Thomas · 2006 to 2026
$5.7M
Using Behavioral Economics to Promote Exercise among Inactive Overweight AdultsR03CA188473 · NCI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI GALARRAGA, OMAR, WILLIAMS, DAVID M · 2015 to 2016
$163k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA188473NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL076134NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regular physical activity (PA) enhances weight-loss and reduces risk of chronic disease. However, as few as 10% of U.S. adults engage in regular PA. Incentive programs to promote PA have shown some promise, but have typically used incentives that are too large to sustain over time and have not demonstrated habit formation or been tested in community settings. This report presents the rationale and design of a randomized pilot study testing the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of small monetary incentives for PA (n=25) versus charitable donations in the same amount (n=25) versus control (n=25) over 12months among 75 low-active but otherwise healthy adults at a local YMCA. Incentives are based on YMCA attendance, which is verified by electronic swipe card data and is the primary study outcome, with self-reported minutes/week of PA assessed as a secondary outcome. Incentives are intentionally small enough-$1/session, maximum of $5/week-such that they could be indefinitely sustained by community organizations, privately-owned health clubs, healthcare organizations, or employers (e.g., employer fitness facilities). Costs of the incentive program for the sponsoring organization may be partially offset by increases in membership resulting from the appeal of the program. Moreover, if efficacious, the charitable donation incentive program may have the added benefit of building social capital for the sponsoring organization and potentially serving as a tax write-off, thus further offsetting the cost of the incentives. Findings will also have implications for the use of financially sustainable community-based incentive programs for other health-related behaviors (e.g., weight loss, smoking).

Indexed as

CharitiesExerciseMotivationAdultEnergy MetabolismFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProof of Concept StudyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29374526
PMCPMC6022749
OpenAlexW2791295683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.