Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29374506›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2018

Nepal's Health Facility Operation and Management Committees: exploring community participation and influence in the Dang district's primary care clinics.

Gagan Gurung, Sarah Derrett, Philip C Hill, Robin Gauld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gagan Gurung1Postdoctoral Fellow,Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine,University of Otago,Dunedin,New Zealand.
Sarah Derrett2Professor, Director,Injury Prevention Unit,Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine,University of Otago,Dunedin,New Zealand.
Philip C Hill3Professor, Co-Director,Centre for International Health,Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine,University of Otago,Dunedin,New Zealand.
Robin Gauld4Professor, Pro-Vice-Chancellor & Dean,Otago Business School and Division of Commerce,University of Otago,Dunedin,New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AimTo describe community representation in Nepal's Health Facility Operation and Management Committees (HFMCs) and the degree of influence of community representatives in the HFMC decision-making processes.

backgroundCommunity participation has been recognised as one of the key components for the successful implementation of primary health care (PHC) strategies, following the 1978 Declaration of Alma-Ata. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), HFMCs are now widely considered as a mechanism to increase community participation in health through community representation. There is some research examining the implementation process, impact and factors affecting the effectiveness of HFMCs. Despite the documented evidence of the importance of factors such as adequate representation, links with wider community, and decision-making power, there is limited evidence about the nature of community representation and degree of decision making within HFMCs in the PHC setting, particularly in LMICs.

methodsQualitative interviews with 39 key informants were held to explore different aspects of community representation in HFMCs, and the influence of the HFMC on health facility decision-making processes. In addition, a facility audit at 22 facilities and review of HFMC meeting minutes at six health facilities were conducted.FindingsThere were Dalit (a marginalised caste) and Janajati (an ethnic group) representations in 77% and 100% of the committees, respectively. Likewise, there were at least two female members in each committee. However, the HFMC member selection process and decision making within the committees were influenced by powerful elites. The degree of participation through HFMCs appeared to be at the 'Manipulation' and 'Informing' stage of Arnstein's ladder of participation. In conclusion, despite representation of the community on HFMCs, the depth of participation seems low. There is a need to ensure a democratic selection process of committee members; and to expand the depth of participation.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesCommunity ParticipationDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNepalPrimary Health Carecommunity representationdegree of participationHealth Facility Operation and Management Committeehealth sector decentralisationNepalparticipationprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID29374506
PMCPMC6452933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.