ArticleBMC genomics2018
Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity before and after genomic selection in North American Holstein cattle.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population Differentiation and Polygenic Selection in the Finnish Ayrshire Cows Selected on Genomic Information.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026Article
- Analysis of Inbreeding, Population Structure, and Genetic Diversity in the Kumamoto Sub-Breed of Japanese Brown Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Genomic partitioning and functional dissection of inbreeding depression for stature in Brown Swiss cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Runs of homozygosity reveal population dynamics and selection across global cattle.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Restructuring breeding programs 1: Integration of diversity.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Linkage- and ROH-based genomic relationship matrices for IBD based management of genetic diversity.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Genomic Evaluation of the Genetic Structure and Analysis of Selective Evolutionary Signatures of Xupu Goose.Biology · 2026Article
- Probabilities of two alleles being identity by state at unobserved loci predicted by observed loci in cattle populations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A comparative study of runs of homozygosity islands common among 12 Australian beef cattle breeds.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Analysis of Inbreeding Coefficient and Genetic Diversity in Xinjiang Brown Cattle Based on Pedigree and ROH Evaluation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Comparison between SNP array and imputed data to estimate population structure and ROH hotspots in horse breeds.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genetic parameters estimation and optimization of genomic selection in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain): a case study for growth-related traits.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genome scan for runs of homozygosity in Saanen goats selected under tropical environments reveals candidate genes for adaptive and production traits.Tropical animal health and production · 2025Article
- Genetic assessment and Identification of genes related to characterization of Guangdong local goose breeds based on modern and historical genomes.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Exploring genomic signatures of selection for adaptation and resilience in nomadic Belahi cattle in the tropical climate.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Genomic architecture of purebred and crossbred Moghani lambs with Texel and Booroola sheep.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Runs of Homozygosity and Inferences in Wild Populations.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- Impact of Implementing Female Genomic Selection and the Use of Sex-Selected Semen Technology on Genetic Gain in a Dairy Herd in New Zealand.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Exploring inbreeding depression in Brazilian Angus cattle population using pedigree and genomic data.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile autozygosity as a consequence of selection is well understood, there is limited information on the ability of different methods to measure true inbreeding. In the present study, a gene dropping simulation was performed and inbreeding estimates based on runs of homozygosity (ROH), pedigree, and the genomic relationship matrix were compared to true inbreeding. Inbreeding based on ROH was estimated using SNP1101, PLINK, and BCFtools software with different threshold parameters. The effects of different selection methods on ROH patterns were also compared. Furthermore, inbreeding coefficients were estimated in a sample of genotyped North American Holstein animals born from 1990 to 2016 using 50 k chip data and ROH patterns were assessed before and after genomic selection.
resultsUsing ROH with a minimum window size of 20 to 50 using SNP1101 provided the closest estimates to true inbreeding in simulation study. Pedigree inbreeding tended to underestimate true inbreeding, and results for genomic inbreeding varied depending on assumptions about base allele frequencies. Using an ROH approach also made it possible to assess the effect of population structure and selection on distribution of runs of autozygosity across the genome. In the simulation, the longest individual ROH and the largest average length of ROH were observed when selection was based on best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), whereas genomic selection showed the largest number of small ROH compared to BLUP estimated breeding values (BLUP-EBV). In North American Holsteins, the average number of ROH segments of 1 Mb or more per individual increased from 57 in 1990 to 82 in 2016. The rate of increase in the last 5 years was almost double that of previous 5 year periods. Genomic selection results in less autozygosity per generation, but more per year given the reduced generation interval.
conclusionsThis study shows that existing software based on the measurement of ROH can accurately identify autozygosity across the genome, provided appropriate threshold parameters are used. Our results show how different selection strategies affect the distribution of ROH, and how the distribution of ROH has changed in the North American dairy cattle population over the last 25 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.