ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2018
Multicenter validation of cancer gene panel-based next-generation sequencing for translational research and molecular diagnostics.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Genomic profiling of thymoma using a targeted high-throughput approach.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2024Article
- Technical Validation and Clinical Utility of an NGS Targeted Panel to Improve Molecular Characterization of Pediatric Acute Leukemia.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Identification of necroptosis-related subtypes, development of a novel signature, and characterization of immune infiltration in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- A sheet pocket to prevent cross-contamination of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded block for application in next generation sequencing.PloS one · 2022Article
- BRAF testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options.Der Pathologe · 2021Review
- [BRAF-V600E testing in metastatic colorectal cancer and new, chemotherapy-free therapy options. German version].Der Pathologe · 2021Review
- Neuroblastoma Risk Assessment and Treatment Stratification with Hybrid Capture-Based Panel Sequencing.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing with Liquid Biopsies from Treatment-Naïve Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients.Cancers · 2021Review
- Routine Molecular Pathology Diagnostics in Precision Oncology.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021Article
- Comparative analysis of targeted next-generation sequencing panels for the detection of gene mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an ERIC multi-center study.Haematologica · 2021Article
- Third-Generation Sequencing in the Clinical Laboratory: Exploring the Advantages and Challenges of Nanopore Sequencing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Review
- Performance validation of an amplicon-based targeted next-generation sequencing assay and mutation profiling of 648 Chinese colorectal cancer patients.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2018Article
- Personalized Clinical Decision Making Through Implementation of a Molecular Tumor Board: A German Single-Center Experience.JCO precision oncology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The simultaneous detection of multiple somatic mutations in the context of molecular diagnostics of cancer is frequently performed by means of amplicon-based targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, only few studies are available comparing multicenter testing of different NGS platforms and gene panels. Therefore, seven partner sites of the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) performed a multicenter interlaboratory trial for targeted NGS using the same formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimen of molecularly pre-characterized tumors (n = 15; each n = 5 cases of Breast, Lung, and Colon carcinoma) and a colorectal cancer cell line DNA dilution series. Detailed information regarding pre-characterized mutations was not disclosed to the partners. Commercially available and custom-designed cancer gene panels were used for library preparation and subsequent sequencing on several devices of two NGS different platforms. For every case, centrally extracted DNA and FFPE tissue sections for local processing were delivered to each partner site to be sequenced with the commercial gene panel and local bioinformatics. For cancer-specific panel-based sequencing, only centrally extracted DNA was analyzed at seven sequencing sites. Subsequently, local data were compiled and bioinformatics was performed centrally. We were able to demonstrate that all pre-characterized mutations were re-identified correctly, irrespective of NGS platform or gene panel used. However, locally processed FFPE tissue sections disclosed that the DNA extraction method can affect the detection of mutations with a trend in favor of magnetic bead-based DNA extraction methods. In conclusion, targeted NGS is a very robust method for simultaneous detection of various mutations in FFPE tissue specimens if certain pre-analytical conditions are carefully considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.