ReviewDer Radiologe2018
[Advanced cartilage imaging for detection of cartilage injuries and osteochondral lesions].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Semiquantitative index of symptomatic minor instability of the lateral elbow at CT arthrography (SMILE index): clinical applicability and reproducibility study.European radiology · 2024Article
- Ankle Sprains in Athletes: Current Epidemiological, Clinical and Imaging Trends.Open access journal of sports medicine · 2023Review
- Intraoperative hyperspectral imaging (HSI) as a new diagnostic tool for the detection of cartilage degeneration.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Overuse-related instability of the elbow: the role of CT-arthrography.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
- Treatment of Unicompartmental Cartilage Defects of the Knee with Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Patellofemoral Partial Knee Arthroplasty or Focal Resurfacing.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- [43/m-occasional ankle sprain and symptoms of muscle fatigue : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 67].Der Orthopade · 2021Article
- [MR and CT arthrography in cartilage imaging : Indications and implementation].Der Radiologe · 2019Review
- [Magnetic resonance imaging following cartilage repair of focal chondral lesions].Der Radiologe · 2019Review
- [Update cartilage imaging of the small joints : Focus on high-field MRI].Der Radiologe · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteochondral defects represent a main risk factor for osteoarthritis of the ankle.
objectivesThe aim of this article is to provide an overview of current optimal clinical cartilage imaging techniques of the foot and ankle and to show typical osteochondral injuries on imaging. MATERIALS AND
methodsA thorough literature search was performed and was supported by personal experience.
resultsCartilage imaging of the foot and ankle remains challenging. However, advanced morphological and quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques may provide useful clinical information, for example, concerning cartilage repair surgery. Compared to MRI, MR arthrography (MR-A) and CT arthrography (CT-A) have higher sensitivity with respect to detection of osteochondral defects. Regarding smaller joints of the foot, mainly advanced osteoarthritic changes are detected on conventional radiography; only in rare cases, MR and CT imaging of these smaller joints is of relevance.
conclusionsWhile at the smaller joints of the foot cartilage imaging only plays a minor role, at the ankle joint cross-sectional cartilage imaging using CT and MRI becomes more and more important for clinicians due to emerging therapeutic options, such as different osteochondral repair techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.