Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29374272›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Structural changes in alginate-based microspheres exposed to in vivo environment as revealed by confocal Raman microscopy.

Zuzana Kroneková, Michal Pelach, Petra Mazancová, Lucia Uhelská, Dušana Treľová, Filip Rázga, Veronika Némethová, Szabolcs Szalai, Dušan Chorvát, James J McGarrigle and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Current Status of Alginate in Drug Delivery.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Zuzana KronekováDepartment for Biomaterials Research, Polymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 41, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-8901
Michal PelachDepartment of Multilayers and Nanostructures, Institute of Physics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 11, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Petra MazancováDepartment for Biomaterials Research, Polymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 41, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-2043
Lucia UhelskáDepartment for Biomaterials Research, Polymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 41, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Dušana TreľováDepartment for Biomaterials Research, Polymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 41, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Filip RázgaDepartment for Biomaterials Research, Polymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 41, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Veronika NémethováDepartment for Biomaterials Research, Polymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 41, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Szabolcs SzalaiDepartment for Biomaterials Research, Polymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 41, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Dušan ChorvátDepartment of Biophotonics, International Laser Center, Ilkovicova 3, 841 04, Bratislava, Slovakia.
James J McGarrigleDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA.
Mustafa OmamiDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA.
Douglas IsaDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA.
Sofia GhaniDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA.
Eva MajkováDepartment of Multilayers and Nanostructures, Institute of Physics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 11, Bratislava, Slovakia.
José OberholzerDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, USA.
Vladimír RausDepartment for Biomaterials Research, Polymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 41, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9424-3243
Peter ŠiffalovičDepartment of Multilayers and Nanostructures, Institute of Physics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 11, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9807-0810
Igor LacíkDepartment for Biomaterials Research, Polymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 41, Bratislava, Slovakia. igor.lacik@savba.sk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A next-generation cure for type 1 diabetes relies on immunoprotection of insulin-producing cells, which can be achieved by their encapsulation in microspheres made of non-covalently crosslinked hydrogels. Treatment success is directly related to the microsphere structure that is characterized by the localization of the polymers constituting the hydrogel material. However, due to the lack of a suitable analytical method, it is presently unknown how the microsphere structure changes in vivo, which complicates evaluation of different encapsulation approaches. Here, confocal Raman microscopy (CRM) imaging was tailored to serve as a powerful new tool for tracking structural changes in two major encapsulation designs, alginate-based microbeads and multi-component microcapsules. CRM analyses before implantation and after explantation from a mouse model revealed complete loss of the original heterogeneous structure in the alginate microbeads, making the intentionally high initial heterogeneity a questionable design choice. On the other hand, the structural heterogeneity was conserved in the microcapsules, which indicates that this design will better retain its immunoprotective properties in vivo. In another application, CRM was used for quantitative mapping of the alginate concentration throughout the microbead volume. Such data provide invaluable information about the microenvironment cells would encounter upon their encapsulation in alginate microbeads.

Identifiers

PMID29374272
PMCPMC5785987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.