Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29374200›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Interplay between TETs and microRNAs in the adult brain for memory formation.

Eloïse A Kremer, Niharika Gaur, Melissa A Lee, Olivia Engmann, Johannes Bohacek, Isabelle M Mansuy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A neuroscientist's guide to transgenic mice and other genetic tools.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eloïse A KremerLaboratory of Neuroepigenetics, University of Zürich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Brain Research Institute, Neuroscience Center Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Niharika GaurLaboratory of Neuroepigenetics, University of Zürich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Brain Research Institute, Neuroscience Center Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Melissa A LeeDepartment of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Olivia EngmannLaboratory of Neuroepigenetics, University of Zürich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Brain Research Institute, Neuroscience Center Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Johannes BohacekLaboratory of Neuroepigenetics, University of Zürich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Brain Research Institute, Neuroscience Center Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Isabelle M MansuyLaboratory of Neuroepigenetics, University of Zürich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Brain Research Institute, Neuroscience Center Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland. mansuy@hifo.uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7785-5371
University of Zurich · CHColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

5-hydroxymethylation (5-hmC) is an epigenetic modification on DNA that results from the conversion of 5-methylcytosine by Ten-Eleven Translocation (TET) proteins. 5-hmC is widely present in the brain and is subjected to dynamic regulation during development and upon neuronal activity. It was recently shown to be involved in memory processes but currently, little is known about how it is controlled in the brain during memory formation. Here, we show that Tet3 is selectively up-regulated by activity in hippocampal neurons in vitro, and after formation of fear memory in the hippocampus. This is accompanied by a decrease in miR-29b expression that, through complementary sequences, regulates the level of Tet3 by preferential binding to its 3'UTR. We newly reveal that SAM68, a nuclear RNA-binding protein known to regulate splicing, acts upstream of miR-29 by modulating its biogenesis. Together, these findings identify novel players in the adult brain necessary for the regulation of 5-hmC during memory formation.

Indexed as

FearGene Expression RegulationMemory5-MethylcytosineAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsDioxygenasesDNA-Binding ProteinsHippocampusMice, Inbred C57BLMicroRNAsProto-Oncogene ProteinsRNA-Binding Proteins5-MethylcytosineAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingDioxygenasesDNA-Binding ProteinsKhdrbs1 protein, mouseMicroRNAsMIRN29 microRNA, mouseProto-Oncogene ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsTet3 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID29374200
PMCPMC5786039
OpenAlexW2790505260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.