Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29373975›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2018

Evaluation of a community-based, family focused healthy weights initiative using the RE-AIM framework.

Mary E Jung, Jessica E Bourne, Heather L Gainforth

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Feasibility and Acceptability of the Project Faith Influencing Transformation Intervention in Faith-Based Settings.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mary E JungSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada. mary.jung@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2360-0952
Jessica E BourneCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Heather L GainforthSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood overweight and obesity is a major public health concern. Community-based interventions have the potential to reach caregivers and children. However, the overall health impact of these programs is rarely comprehensively assessed. This study evaluated a physical activity and healthy eating family program (Healthy Together; HT) using the RE-AIM framework.

methodsTen sites implemented the 5-week program. Thirty-nine staff members and 277 program participants (126 caregivers [M

resultsReach: HT participants were almost entirely recruited from existing programs within sites. Effectiveness: Caregivers' nutrition related efficacy beliefs increased following HT (ps < .03). Participation in HT was not associated with significant changes in physical activity or nutrition behaviour or perceived social support (ps > .05). Knowledge surrounding healthy diets and physical activity increased in children and caregivers (ps < .05). Adoption: Thirty-five percent of sites approached to implement HT expressed interest. The 10 sites selected recruited existing staff members to implement HT. IMPLEMENTATION: Program objectives were met 72.8% of the time and 71 adaptations were made. HT was finance- and time-dependent. Maintenance: Two sites fully implemented HT in the follow-up year and 5 sites incorporated aspects of HT into other programs.

conclusionsWorking alongside organizations that develop community programs to conduct comprehensive, arms-length evaluations can systematically highlight areas of success and challenges. Overall HT represents a feasible community-based intervention; however further support is required in order to ensure the program is effective at positively targeting the desired outcomes. As a result of this evaluation, modifications are currently being implemented to HT.

Indexed as

DietExerciseFamilyHealth BehaviorProgram EvaluationAdolescentAdultCaregiversChildCommunity Health ServicesFeeding BehaviorFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansMaleChildrenCommunityEvaluation of a community-basedFamily focused healthy weights initiative using the RE-AIM frameworkHealthy weightProgram evaluation

Identifiers

PMID29373975
PMCPMC5787319
OpenAlexW2784495294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.