Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29373959›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Sequential decitabine and carboplatin treatment increases the DNA repair protein XPC, increases apoptosis and decreases proliferation in melanoma.

Timothy Budden, Andre van der Westhuizen, Nikola A Bowden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Drugging the Epigenome: Overcoming Resistance to Targeted and Immunotherapies in Melanoma.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Key actors in cancer therapy: epigenetic modifiers.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy BuddenHunter Medical Research Institute and Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Andre van der WesthuizenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Nikola A BowdenHunter Medical Research Institute and Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. nikola.Bowden@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6047-1694
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUCalvary Mater Newcastle Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelanoma has two key features, an over-representation of UV-induced mutations and resistance to DNA damaging chemotherapy agents. Both of these features may result from dysfunction of the nucleotide excision repair pathway, in particular the DNA damage detection branch, global genome repair (GGR). The key GGR component XPC does not respond to DNA damage in melanoma, the cause of this lack of response has not been investigated. In this study, we investigated the role of methylation in reduced XPC in melanoma.

methodsTo reduce methylation and induce DNA-damage, melanoma cell lines were treated with decitabine and carboplatin, individually and sequentially. Global DNA methylation levels, XPC mRNA and protein expression and methylation of the XPC promoter were examined. Apoptosis, cell proliferation and senescence were also quantified. XPC siRNA was used to determine that the responses seen were reliant on XPC induction.

resultsTreatment with high-dose decitabine resulted in global demethylation, including the the shores of the XPC CpG island and significantly increased XPC mRNA expression. Lower, clinically relevant dose of decitabine also resulted in global demethylation including the CpG island shores and induced XPC in 50% of cell lines. Decitabine followed by DNA-damaging carboplatin treatment led to significantly higher XPC expression in 75% of melanoma cell lines tested. Combined sequential treatment also resulted in a greater apoptotic response in 75% of cell lines compared to carboplatin alone, and significantly slowed cell proliferation, with some melanoma cell lines going into senescence. Inhibiting the increased XPC using siRNA had a small but significant negative effect, indicating that XPC plays a partial role in the response to sequential decitabine and carboplatin.

conclusionsDemethylation using decitabine increased XPC and apoptosis after sequential carboplatin. These results confirm that sequential decitabine and carboplatin requires further investigation as a combination treatment for melanoma.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsApoptosisAzacitidineCarboplatinCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCpG IslandsDecitabineDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA MethylationDNA RepairGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansMelanomaAntineoplastic AgentsAzacitidineCarboplatinDecitabineDNA-Binding ProteinsXPC protein, humanCarboplatinDecitabineMelanomaMethylationXPC

Identifiers

PMID29373959
PMCPMC5787239
OpenAlexW2784938501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.