Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29373809›Full record

ReviewDiscovery medicine2017

Pressing diseases that represent promising targets for gene therapy.

Marie Beitelshees, Andrew Hill, Pooya Rostami, Charles H Jones, Blaine A Pfeifer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discovery medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Gene Therapy Today and Tomorrow.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  4. Viral Vectors in Gene Therapy.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  5. Nano Approaches to Nucleic Acid Delivery: Barriers, Solutions, and Current Landscape.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie BeitelsheesDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Andrew HillDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Pooya RostamiAbcombi Biosciences Inc., Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Charles H JonesAbcombi Biosciences Inc., Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Blaine A PfeiferDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.

Funding

A Hybrid Bio-synthetic Vector Designed to Elicit Directed in vivo Immune ResponseR21AI117309 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI PFEIFER, BLAINE A. · 2016 to 2017
$435k
Therapy for drug resistant influenza strains by nucleic acid targeting of respiratory airwaysR41AI124851 · NIAID · ABCOMBI BIOSCIENCES, INC. · PI JONES, CHARLES HOUSTON · 2016 to 2017
$350k
A Hybrid Biomaterial-biological Vector for Antigen Presenting Cell Gene DeliveryR03AI088485 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI PFEIFER, BLAINE A. · 2010 to 2011
$145k
NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI088485NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI117309NIAID NIH HHS R41 AI124851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over time, there has been a growing interest in the application of gene therapy within the healthcare industry as demonstrated by the nearly 3,000 clinical trials associated with gene therapy that are listed in clinicaltrials.gov. However, there are various difficulties associated with gene therapy that have limited the realization of licensed gene therapies to only a handful of treatments. Furthermore, efforts to develop gene therapeutics have been narrowly focused and most clinical trials have sought to develop treatments for cancer (64.6%), monogenic diseases (10.5%), infectious diseases (7.4%), and cardiovascular diseases (7.4%). In addition, nearly 70% of clinical trials have utilized viral-based delivery systems, despite various concerns associated with this strategy. Each of these factors highlights the lack of diversity in the development of gene therapeutics that should be addressed. In recent years, developments in gene manipulation and delivery such as CRISPR and non-viral vectors (e.g., liposomes) demonstrate promise for improving outcomes for gene therapy. The increased fidelity and capacity afforded by these technologies provide the potential to improve upon contemporary gene therapy approaches and enable the development of treatments for less-emphasized disorders. In this review, we provide a summary of gene delivery technology and discuss various developments in gene therapy technology. We conclude by proposing several genetic conditions that represent promising targets for gene therapy given recent developments in gene delivery and manipulation.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TherapyHumansInfectionsNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29373809
PMCPMC9890200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.