ArticleJournal of animal science2018
Modeling heterotic effects in beef cattle using genome-wide SNP-marker genotypes.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of genomic retained heterosis on lactation persistence and tropical resilience: leveraging joint-model GWAS to quantify non-additive variance in India's Karan Fries population.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Article
- The rumen microbiome and its metabolome together with the host metabolome regulate the growth performance of crossbred cattle.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- The Effect of Continuous Selection in KiwiCrossAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Analysis of Growth Models in Galician × Nelore Crossbred Cattle in the First Year of Life.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Dominance is common in mammals and is associated with trans-acting gene expression and alternative splicing.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Genomic Analysis of Heterosis in an Angus × Hereford Cattle Population.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Unraveling genetic admixture in the Indian crossbred cattle by different approaches using Bovine 50K BeadChip.Tropical animal health and production · 2022Article
- Article
- The impact of using different ancestral reference populations in assessing crossbred population admixture and influence on performance.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Functional Analysis of Haplotypes in BovineAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Article
- Estimation of Genomic Breed Composition for Purebred and Crossbred Animals Using Sparsely Regularized Admixture Models.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Characterization of water intake and water efficiency in beef cattle1,2.Journal of animal science · 2019Article
- Evaluation of a genomic-enhanced sorting system for feeder cattle1.Journal of animal science · 2019Article
- Genome-wide association scan for heterotic quantitative trait loci in multi-breed and crossbred beef cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An objective of commercial beef cattle crossbreeding programs is to simultaneously optimize use of additive (breed differences) and non-additive (heterosis) effects. A total of 6,794 multibreed and crossbred beef cattle with phenotype and Illumina BovineSNP50 genotype data were used to predict genomic heterosis for growth and carcass traits by applying two methods assumed to be linearly proportional to heterosis. The methods were as follows: 1) retained heterozygosity predicted from genomic breed fractions (HET1) and 2) deviation of adjusted crossbred phenotype from midparent value (HET2). Comparison of methods was based on prediction accuracy from cross-validation. Here, a mutually exclusive random sampling of all crossbred animals (n = 5,327) was performed to form five groups replicated five times with approximately 1,065 animals per group. In each run within a replicate, one group was assigned as a validation set, while the remaining four groups were combined to form the reference set. The phenotype of the animals in the validation set was assumed to be unknown; thus, it resulted in every animal having heterosis values that were predicted without using its own phenotype, allowing their adjusted phenotype to be used for validation. The same approach was used to test the impact of predicted heterosis on accuracy of genomic breeding values (GBV). The results showed positive heterotic effects for growth traits but not for carcass traits that reflect the importance of heterosis for growth traits in beef cattle. Heterosis predicted by HET1 method resulted in less variable estimates that were mostly within the range of estimates generated by HET2. Prediction accuracy was greater for HET2 (0.37-0.98) than HET1 (0.34-0.43). Proper consideration of heterosis in genomic evaluation models has debatable effects on accuracy of EBV predictions. However, opportunity exists for predicting heterosis, improving accuracy of genomic selection, and consequently optimizing crossbreeding programs in beef cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.