Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29373666›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2018

Identification of Odor Blend Used by Caenorhabditis elegans for Pathogen Recognition.

Soleil E Worthy, German L Rojas, Charles J Taylor, Elizabeth E Glater

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The AWCmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A non-invasive screening method usingBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The nematode wormeLife · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soleil E WorthyDepartment of Chemistry, Pomona College, Claremont, CA, USA.
German L RojasDepartment of Neuroscience, Pomona College, Claremont, CA, USA.
Charles J TaylorDepartment of Chemistry, Pomona College, Claremont, CA, USA.
Elizabeth E GlaterDepartment of Neuroscience, Pomona College, Claremont, CA, USA.
Pomona College · US

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals have evolved specialized pathways to detect appropriate food sources and avoid harmful ones. Caenorhabditis elegans can distinguish among the odors of various species of bacteria, its major food source, but little is known about what specific chemical cue or combination of chemical cues C. elegans uses to detect and recognize different microbes. Here, we examine the strong innate attraction of C. elegans for the odor of the pathogenic bacterium, Serratia marcescens. This initial attraction likely facilitates ingestion and infection of the C. elegans host. Using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, we identify 5 volatile odors released by S. marcescens and identify those that are attractive to C. elegans. We use genetic methods to show that the amphid chemosensory neuron, AWCON, senses both S. marcescens-released 2-butanone and acetone and drives attraction to S. marcescens. In C. elegans, pairing a single odorant with food deprivation results in a reduced attractive response for that specific odor. We find that pairing the natural odor of S. marcescens with food deprivation results in a reduced attraction for the natural odor of S. marcescens and a similar reduced attraction for the synthetic blend of acetone and 2-butanone. This result indicates that only 2 odorants represent the more complex odor bouquet of S. marcescens. Although bacterial-released volatiles have long been known to be attractive to C. elegans, this study defines for the first time specific volatile cues that represent a particular bacterium to C. elegans.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansOdorantsSensory Receptor CellsSerratia marcescens

Identifiers

PMID29373666
PMCPMC6018680
OpenAlexW2789318877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.