Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29373506›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Annoyance Judgment and Measurements of Environmental Noise: A Focus on Italian Secondary Schools.

Fabrizio Minichilli, Francesca Gorini, Elena Ascari, Fabrizio Bianchi, Alessio Coi, Luca Fredianelli, Gaetano Licitra, Federica Manzoli, Lorena Mezzasalma, Liliana Cori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The Impact of Non-Acoustic Factors on Chinese Community Response to Noise: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Noise Indicators Relating to Non-Auditory Health Effects in Children-A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Study on the Effect ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Traffic Noise at Moderate Levels Affects Cognitive Performance: Do Distance-Induced Temporal Changes Matter?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Analysis and Acoustic Event Classification of Environmental Data Collected in a Citizen Science Project.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Indoor Environmental Comfort Assessment of Traditional Folk Houses: A Case Study in Southern Anhui, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Perception of National Park Soundscape and Its Effects on Visual Aesthetics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Evaluating the Impact of Metro Interior Noise on Passenger Annoyance: An Experimental Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fabrizio MinichilliUnit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy. fabrizio.minichilli@ifc.cnr.it.
Francesca GoriniUnit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy. fgorini@ifc.cnr.it.
Elena AscariEnvironmental Protection Agency-Tuscany Region, 50144 Firenze, Italy. elena.ascari@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7542-0849
Fabrizio BianchiUnit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy. fabrizio.bianchi@ifc.cnr.it.
Alessio CoiUnit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy. alessio.coi@ifc.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9816-3144
Luca FredianelliiPool s.r.l., 56121 Pisa, Italy. luca.fredianelli@gmail.com.
Gaetano LicitraEnvironmental Protection Agency-Tuscany Region, 50144 Firenze, Italy. gaetano.licitra@arpat.toscana.it.
Federica ManzoliUnit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy. federica.manzoli@unimore.it.
Lorena MezzasalmaUnit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy. lorena.mezzasalma@ifc.cnr.it.
Liliana CoriUnit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy. liliana.cori@ifc.cnr.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of noise on students' health, well-being, and learning are of growing concern among both the general public and policy-makers in Europe. Several studies have highlighted the consequences of noise on children's learning and performance at school. This study investigates the relationship between noise judgment in school goers aged 11-18 and noise measurements aimed at evaluating their exposure at school. For this purpose, a questionnaire was administered to 521 individuals in 28 classrooms in eight schools of four cities in Italy, with different environmental characteristics. Using a Likert-type scale, a selected set of responses related to noise generated an Annoyance Index (AI) score for each student and a classroom median score (MAI). From the noise data acquired, a global noise score (GNS) was assigned to each classroom. A higher AI was found in industrialized areas and among younger students. No significant differences in noise judgment were found by gender. A significant inverse correlation was described between MAI and GNS, thus the better the acoustic quality of the classrooms, the less the perceived noise and annoyance. The results show that noise perception and consequent disturbance are highly correlated with classroom acoustics, and confirm that annoyance represents the most widespread subjective response to noise.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionEmotionsSchoolsAcousticsAdolescentChildEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansItalyJudgmentMaleNoiseStress, PsychologicalStudentsSurveys and Questionnairesannoyanceannoyance indexchildrenenvironmenthealthnoisequestionnairerisk perception

Identifiers

PMID29373506
PMCPMC5858277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.