Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29373503›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2018

Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Regular Activity Breaks does not Acutely Influence Appetite: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Evelyn M Mete, Tracy L Perry, Jillian J Haszard, Ashleigh R Homer, Stephen P Fenemor, Nancy J Rehrer, C Murray Skeaff, Meredith C Peddie

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Physiology of sedentary behavior.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evelyn M MeteDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. evelyn.mete@postgrad.otago.ac.nz.
Tracy L PerryDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. tracy.perry@otago.ac.nz.
Jillian J HaszardDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. jill.haszard@otago.ac.nz.
Ashleigh R HomerDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. ash.homer@postgrad.otago.ac.nz.
Stephen P FenemorSchool of Physical Education, Sport, and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. stephen.fenemor@otago.ac.nz.
Nancy J RehrerSchool of Physical Education, Sport, and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. nancy.rehrer@otago.ac.nz.
C Murray SkeaffDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. murray.skeaff@otago.ac.nz.
Meredith C PeddieDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. meredith.peddie@otago.ac.nz.
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regular activity breaks increase energy expenditure; however, this may promote compensatory eating behaviour. The present study compared the effects of regular activity breaks and prolonged sitting on appetite. In a randomised, cross-over trial, 36 healthy adults (BMI (Body Mass Index) 23.9 kg/m² (S.D. = 3.9)) completed four, two-day interventions: two with prolonged sitting (SIT), and two with sitting and 2 min of walking every 30 min (RAB). Standardized meals were provided throughout the intervention, with an

Indexed as

Appetite RegulationSedentary BehaviorUrban HealthWalkingAdolescentAdultCross-Over StudiesEnergy IntakeEnergy MetabolismExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMealsNew ZealandSatiety Responseappetiterandomized controlled trialregular activity breakssedentary

Identifiers

PMID29373503
PMCPMC5852701
OpenAlexW2792428527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.