Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29373330›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2018

The importance of cohort research starting early in life to understanding child health.

Nigel Paneth, Catherine Monk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Perinatal Factors and Emotional, Cognitive, and Behavioral Dysregulation in Childhood and Adolescence.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. The complex aetiology of cerebral palsy.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nigel PanethDepartments of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Pediatrics & Human Development, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan.
Catherine MonkDepartments of Psychiatry & Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Understanding Breastfeeding Practices Among ECHO Cohort Participants Before and During/After the COVID-19 PandemicUH3OD023285 · OD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Charles James Barone, MICHAEL R. ELLIOTT · 2018 to 2026
$24.5M
BREAKING THE CYCLE OF INTERGENERATIONAL DISADVANTAGE: NEURODEVELOPMENT AMONG PUERTO RICAN CHILDREN.UH3OD023328 · OD · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI CANINO, GLORISA J, DUARTE, CRISTIANE S. · 2018 to 2022
$18.3M
Prenatal Exposures and Child Health Outcomes: A Statewide StudyUG3OD023285 · OD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BARONE, CHARLES JAMES, ELLIOTT, MICHAEL R. · 2016 to 2024
$12.9M
Exposome Contributors to Child Health Originating from National Fetal Growth Study (ECCHO-NFGS)UG3OD023316 · OD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HUNT, KELLY J, WAPNER, RONALD · 2016 to 2017
$10.8M
Breaking the cycle of intergenerational disadvantage: neurodevelopment among Puerto Rican children.UG3OD023328 · OD · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI CANINO, GLORISA J, DUARTE, CRISTIANE S. · 2016 to 2017
$4.5M
NIH HHS UG3 OD023285NIH HHS UG3 OD023316NIH HHS UG3 OD023328NIH HHS UH3 OD023285NIH HHS UH3 OD023328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe current review addresses the importance of the prospective cohort design in large, unselected populations starting early in life for understanding the origins of childhood health disorders. RECENT

findingsCohort studies originating in healthy populations have contributed to great advances in health, especially in cardiovascular diseases, but have only recently been applied systematically to study the origins of childhood disorders. Several large population-based pregnancy and/or birth cohorts have been developed in different parts of the world, and these are beginning to contribute to better understanding of the underlying causes of rare but important childhood disorders, such as autism. The environmental influences on child health outcomes (ECHO) Program is distinct in leveraging and building upon 84 existing cohorts to prospectively investigate the role of early-life exposures and underlying biological mechanisms in childhood health and disease, specifically perinatal conditions, obesity, neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma and related pulmonary disorders as well as optimum child health. ECHO is expected to comprise approximately 50 000 children. It is the first US study of this size and scope since the US Collaborative Perinatal Project of 1959-1966. SUMMARY: The ECHO project represents a new approach to cohort studies in childhood, efficiently making use of extant cohorts while adding new data collection elements that should permit novel insights into the underlying causes of several important pediatric conditions.

Indexed as

Child HealthEnvironmental HealthNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Research DesignAge FactorsBiomedical ResearchChildEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsProspective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29373330
PMCPMC5901891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.