Observational studyAtencion primaria2018
[Antipneumococcal vaccination in Catalonian adults: Vaccine coverages and adequacy to distinct guideline recommendations].
Observational study in Atencion primaria, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Pneumococcal vaccine uptake among high-risk adults and children in Italy: results from the OBVIOUS project survey.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and barriers of healthcare professionals and adults ≥ 65 years about vaccine-preventable diseases in Spain: the ADult Vaccination drIverS and barriErs (ADVISE) study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Serotypes and Clonal Composition of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates Causing IPD in Children and Adults in Catalonia before 2013 to 2015 and after 2017 to 2019 Systematic Introduction of PCV13.Microbiology spectrum · 2021Article
- Compliance with the guidelines on recommended immunization schedule in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: implications on public health policies.BMC public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo know antipneumococcal vaccination coverages among Catalonian adults and evaluate the adequacy of vaccine use according to 3 distinct current vaccination guidelines.
designPopulation-based cross-sectional study.
settingPrimary Health Care. Catalonia, Spain.
participantsA total of 2,033,465 individuals≥50 years-old registered in the Catalonian Health Institute. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Vaccination status for the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) and/or the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was revised at 1/01/2015. Adequacy of vaccination status was determined according to 3 distinct vaccination recommendation guidelines: Spanish Ministry of Health (basically coinciding with Catalonian Health Institute's recommendations), Spanish Society of Family Physicians (semFYC) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
resultsOverall, 789,098 (38.8%) persons had received PPV23 and 5,031 (0.2%) had received PCV13. PPV23 coverage largely increased with increasing age (4.8% in 50-59 years, 35.5% in 60-69 years, 71.9% in 70-79 years and 79.5% in≥80 years; P<.001), whereas PCV13 coverage was very small in all age groups. Considering the 3 analysed vaccine guidelines a 46.1% of the overall study population were adequacy vaccinated according to Spanish Ministry's recommendations, 19.3% according to semFYC's recommendations and 4.6% according to CDC's recommendations.
conclusionPPV23 coverage among Catalonian adults may be considered as intermediate, but PCV13 coverage is very small. The institutional recommendations (Spanish Ministry) are more followed than corporative (semFYC) or less local (CDC) recommendations in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.