Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29372660›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2018

Current challenges for cancer vaccine adjuvant development.

William S Bowen, Abhishek K Svrivastava, Lalit Batra, Hampartsoum Barsoumian, Haval Shirwan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. PolyoxidoniumFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SC2-3, a Marine Nutrient Glycopeptide fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William S Bowena Institute for Cellular Therapeutics and Department of Microbiology and Immunology , University of Louisville , Louisville , KY , USA.
Abhishek K Svrivastavab Division of Surgical Oncology , University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.
Lalit Batraa Institute for Cellular Therapeutics and Department of Microbiology and Immunology , University of Louisville , Louisville , KY , USA.
Hampartsoum Barsoumianc Radiation Oncology , University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA.
Haval Shirwana Institute for Cellular Therapeutics and Department of Microbiology and Immunology , University of Louisville , Louisville , KY , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1657-9470
University of Louisville · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Improving the lead rF1-V plague vaccine using an SA-4-1BBL/alum adjuvant platformR21AI112618 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI LAWRENZ, MATTHEW B, SHIRWAN, HAVAL · 2015 to 2016
$413k
Developing a novel adjuvant system for therapeutic vaccines against lung cancerR41CA199956 · NCI · FASCURE THERAPEUTICS, LLC · PI SHIRWAN, HAVAL · 2016 to 2016
$225k
Improving the therapeutic efficacy of a lead vaccine against plague using a novel adjuvant systemR41AI120353 · NIAID · FASCURE THERAPEUTICS, LLC · PI BOWEN, WILLIAM SEAN, LAWRENZ, MATTHEW B · 2015 to 2015
$225k
NCI NIH HHS R41 CA199956NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI112618NIAID NIH HHS R41 AI120353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough much progress has been made in the last decade(s) toward development of effective cancer vaccines, there are still important obstacles to therapeutic successes. New generations of cancer vaccines will benefit from a combination adjuvant approach that targets multiple branches of the immune response. AREAS COVERED: Herein we describe how combinatorial adjuvant strategies can help overcome important obstacles to cancer vaccine development, including antigen immunogenicity and tumor immune suppression. Tumor antigens may be both tolerogenic and may utilize active mechanisms to suppress host immunity, including downregulation of MHC molecules to evade recognition and upregulation of immune inhibitory receptors, to subvert an effective immune response. The current cancer vaccine literature was surveyed to identify advancements in the understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying poor antigen immunogenicity and tumor immune evasion, as well as adjuvant strategies designed to overcome them. EXPERT COMMENTARY: Poor immunogenicity of tumor antigens and tumor immune evasion mechanisms make the design of cancer vaccines challenging. Growing understanding of the tumor microenvironment and associated immune responses indicate the importance of augmenting not only the effector response, but also overcoming the endogenous regulatory response and tumor evasion mechanisms. Therefore, new vaccines will benefit from multi-adjuvanted approaches that simultaneously stimulate immunity while preventing inhibition.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesDrug DesignHumansNeoplasmsTumor EscapeTumor MicroenvironmentAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesAdjuvantcancer vaccinescombination adjuvantsimmune evasionimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29372660
PMCPMC6093214
OpenAlexW2792649187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.