Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29372247›Full record

ArticleJAMA2018

Association of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Among Patients Taking Non-Vitamin K Antagonist vs Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants With In-Hospital Mortality.

Taku Inohara, Ying Xian, Li Liang, Roland A Matsouaka, Jeffrey L Saver, Eric E Smith, Lee H Schwamm, Mathew J Reeves, Adrian F Hernandez, Deepak L Bhatt and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
27.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 230 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Taku InoharaDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Ying XianDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Li LiangDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Roland A MatsouakaDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jeffrey L SaverDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Eric E SmithDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Lee H SchwammDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Mathew J ReevesDepartment of Epidemiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Adrian F HernandezDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Deepak L BhattBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eric D PetersonDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Gregg C FonarowDivision of Cardiology, Ronald Reagan University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles.
Clinical Research Institute · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDuke University · USHarvard University · USMichigan State University · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly used to prevent thromboembolic disease, there are limited data on NOAC-related intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Objective: To assess the association between preceding oral anticoagulant use (warfarin, NOACs, and no oral anticoagulants [OACs]) and in-hospital mortality among patients with ICH. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of 141 311 patients with ICH admitted from October 2013 to December 2016 to 1662 Get With The Guidelines-Stroke hospitals. Exposures: Anticoagulation therapy before ICH, defined as any use of OACs within 7 days prior to hospital arrival. Main Outcomes and Measures: In-hospital mortality. Results: Among 141 311 patients with ICH (mean [SD] age, 68.3 [15.3] years; 48.1% women), 15 036 (10.6%) were taking warfarin and 4918 (3.5%) were taking NOACs preceding ICH, and 39 585 (28.0%) and 5783 (4.1%) were taking concomitant single and dual antiplatelet agents, respectively. Patients with prior use of warfarin or NOACs were older and had higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation and prior stroke. Acute ICH stroke severity (measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) was not significantly different across the 3 groups (median, 9 [interquartile range, 2-21] for warfarin, 8 [2-20] for NOACs, and 8 [2-19] for no OACs). The unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates were 32.6% for warfarin, 26.5% for NOACs, and 22.5% for no OACs. Compared with patients without prior use of OACs, the risk of in-hospital mortality was higher among patients with prior use of warfarin (adjusted risk difference [ARD], 9.0% [97.5% CI, 7.9% to 10.1%]; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.62 [97.5% CI, 1.53 to 1.71]) and higher among patients with prior use of NOACs (ARD, 3.3% [97.5% CI, 1.7% to 4.8%]; AOR, 1.21 [97.5% CI, 1.11-1.32]). Compared with patients with prior use of warfarin, patients with prior use of NOACs had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (ARD, -5.7% [97.5% CI, -7.3% to -4.2%]; AOR, 0.75 [97.5% CI, 0.69 to 0.81]). The difference in mortality between NOAC-treated patients and warfarin-treated patients was numerically greater among patients with prior use of dual antiplatelet agents (32.7% vs 47.1%; ARD, -15.0% [95.5% CI, -26.3% to -3.8%]; AOR, 0.50 [97.5% CI, 0.29 to 0.86]) than among those taking these agents without prior antiplatelet therapy (26.4% vs 31.7%; ARD, -5.0% [97.5% CI, -6.8% to -3.2%]; AOR, 0.77 [97.5% CI, 0.70 to 0.85]), although the interaction P value (.07) was not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with ICH, prior use of NOACs or warfarin was associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared with no OACs. Prior use of NOACs, compared with prior use of warfarin, was associated with lower risk of in-hospital mortality.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAdministration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsCerebral HemorrhageConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicFemaleHumansMalePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRiskVitamin KWarfarinAnticoagulantsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsVitamin KWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID29372247
PMCPMC5839299
OpenAlexW2787493763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.