ReviewObstetrics & gynecology science2018
Colposcopy at a turning point.
Review in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of the swede score in optimizing triage of visual inspection with acetic acid positive women: cross-sectional evidence from Bangladesh.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Ex-House and In-House Cytology for the New Cervical Cancer Screening Assessment.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Population-based self-sampling under primary care conditions - a possible approach for cervical cancer screening in Indonesia (IndoCerCa study).Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Detecting and localizing cervical lesions in colposcopic images with deep semantic feature mining.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Application of EfficientNet-B0 and GRU-based deep learning on classifying the colposcopy diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesions.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Concordance Rate of Colposcopy in Detecting Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Predictive value of 'Smartscopy' for the detection of preinvasive cervical lesions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a diagnostic study.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2022Article
- When is There no Benefit in Performing a Biopsy in the Suspicion of Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix?Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022Observational
- Visual appearance of the uterine cervix differs on the basis of HPV type status in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: the results of a reliable method.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopy and vaginoscopy: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- The challenges of colposcopy for cervical cancer screening in LMICs and solutions by artificial intelligence.BMC medicine · 2020Article
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of high-risk human papilloma self-sampling test for cervical cancer screening in Bolivia.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For women who have abnormal Pap test results, the biopsy under colposcopic evaluation is the gold standard for determining the treatment modality. To increase the effectiveness of colposcopic communication, the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) recently published fourth new nomenclature, aiming to create an evidence-based terminology. To increase the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy, multiple biopsies of two or more sites are recommended. Recently, with the introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer prevention, pre-cancerous diseases caused by virus types 16 and 18 have been reduced, which is expected to reduce the number of colposcopic examinations and make colposcopic diagnosis more difficult.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.